Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil9
The exception is if the player was a BB moved from another table to balance. In the same scenario, the button moves to seat 2 but a supervisor brings in a BB from another table to balance and is placed in seat 3 (This is fine as seat 4 hasn’t been BB yet this orbit anyways). In this spot, Seat 3 will be the BB by himself. The next hand, the button won’t move and S3 will be SB and S4 will be BB. Now the button is again naturally moving every hand.
In this case I would not move the button to seat 2. I would leave the button in seat 1 and put the moved player in seat 2 as a single BB.
Why would I not move the button to the 2 seat ... because dead button doesn't mean a button in an empty seat it means the button doesn't move.
While it doesn't make a substantial difference in the play at this time. Where you seat a player could impact where another player gets moved to at another time so its best to be consistent.
Suppose during the next hand a table gets broken and a player is coming in from the broken table.....
under your method he is coming in on the button. While using my method he comes in to the Big blind in seat 3. (I use this to demonstrate how it matters ... I'm not saying it is necessarily better that he be in any particular position ... just saying a consistent approach is needed here).