Quote:
Originally Posted by Fritz1
Any tips / mental shortcuts for calculating and keeping track of pot size and bet amounts for a pot limit game? I was very good at math when I was younger but some of that has faded over the past 30 years.
BTW, I know the formula, I'm just asking about tips or tricks or mental shortcuts or....well if I knew, I wouldn't be asking
I never really got formal training for this so forgive me if this is obvious stuff but something that wasn't immediately apparent to me is this:
blinds £1/2, utg pot to £7, utg+1 repot £24. 3 callers. next player repots.
to work this out here is my thought process
You basically keep a running tally in your head of how many times you need to multiply the current bet. What I mean by this as that as soon as I calculate that utg+1s raise is £24, I also keep the number 3 in my head.
This way I know that if utg+2 repots then I need to multiply the current bet by 3. In this instance though that player calls, so I increase this running tally to 4. The next 2 players also call, so as each player calls I mentally note 4, 5, 6 as they throw their calls in. This way as soon as a player announces pot I immediately know that I need to multiply the 24 by 6 (plus add the £7 and the blinds) = £154.
This method is essentially getting the hard part out of the way quickly (the multiplication of sometimes awkward numbers) but it works with smaller numbers just as well. You're always better off proactively keeping track of everything so you don't get caught off guard and are less likely to make mistakes. But you can do this method as well if you weren't paying attention;
So if you didn't keep the running count in your head and find yourself in a "Oh ****, he just announced pot and I haven't been paying attention" moment just do this:
Immediately look to the previous bet (£24) and note (3) in your head, and then add 1 to this number for each other £24. (4,5,6) So again we know to multiply the 24 by 6. (remember to add the blinds and the 7). We just basically went backwards from the way we did it initially, but its the same idea.
This is probably better explained in person with chips to demonstrate, but hopefully you get the gist of what I'm saying.
EDIT: bolt2112 got in there first, basically the same thing I was saying, slightly different method.