Aria 1-2 PLO hand. What's the ruling? - Page 2 - Poker Card Room

Yeah exactly what answer20 said. The possible confusion being described, even if sincerely held, has no bearing on whether he owes the pot. Seat 5 is ostensibly confused about the relevance of his confusion — doubly confused!

Quote

11-30-2018 , 01:35 PM

#28

Phat Mack

Twat-Waffle

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 11,942

Quote:

Originally Posted by albedoa

What was the effect?

The Lombard Effect.

Quote

11-30-2018 , 02:39 PM

#29

MJ88

veteran

Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,994

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phat Mack

I don't think the dealer was lazy and I don't think she was trying to save time. She put the all-in plaques out on the table....

Additional info.... I still don't see how Player 5 could have been confused, but I suppose it's possible.....

Quote

11-30-2018 , 03:14 PM

#30

Suit

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 4,744

I think seat 5 was maybe confused because he said pot and then asked how much. Before getting his answer, seat 2 then said pot and asked how much. The dealer then says it has you covered, you're all in. Seat 2 says I'm all in and then seat 5 says call. There is no doubt that means seat 5 is calling whatever it is and he has no recourse of getting out of it. Floor obviously got an easy call right.

Quote

12-01-2018 , 02:33 AM

#31

monikrazy

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 28,046

Easiest ruling ever, he is all in.

Quote

12-01-2018 , 06:17 PM

#32

PFunkaliscious

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 3,061

so what are they quibbling about? like 25 bucks?

it doesn't matter. the dealer said that they were both all in. AAAANNNDD, when you agree to run it twice, that means the player with the lesser amount of money is playing for his entire stack.

it's not even really threadworthy. unless you are trying to embarrass seat 5 more than he already was embarrassed

Quote

12-01-2018 , 07:20 PM

#33

WereBeer

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2013 Posts: 10,700

I saw a player argue and whine for 15 minutes when she called an all in for something like $80 into a $150 pot, lost and it turns out the dealer had miscounted and she actually owed $95.

"But I wouldn't have called $95!" etc.

Quote

12-04-2018 , 10:57 PM

#34

AllJackedUp

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2013 Posts: 2,650

This is a story about noob PL players who don't understand how to count raises in PL, and then one gets mad. Right?

In the noob's defense, I play a 5 card hi/lo PLO game occasionally at a local casino -- and the function of how to count pot sized raises changes from dealer to dealer (we all just pretty much laugh and go with it).

Quote

12-05-2018 , 05:14 AM

#35

seat

journeyman

Join Date: Nov 2018 Posts: 224

I think the confusion is coming from seat 5. He thinks when the dealer said that he's got him covered the dealer meant that he was already squared away and whatever he had already put in the pot had him covered. Seat 5 must be a newb.

Quote

12-06-2018 , 01:23 PM

#36

Bdywax

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 1,253

Quote:

Originally Posted by borg23

It's also absurd they allow running it twice in 1/2 plo which is a pot rake game there

Aria lowered the 1/3 game to 1/2 for beginners. When they did this they stopped allowing people to run it twice, but this game is also filled with regs now and some dealers/floor will turn a blind eye a lot of the time. Personally I don't care, I just wish they would stay consistent across the board.

Quote

12-06-2018 , 06:26 PM

#37

borg23

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 15,013

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bdywax

Aria allows running bit twice in 1/2 plo

Quote

12-12-2018 , 02:44 AM

#38

the_spike

old hand

Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 1,615

This story is interesting but only from the point of view that nothing controversial happened at all and yet a bunch of poker players were yelling. So typical. PLOLOL

Quote

Page 2 of 2

First

1 2

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 2 of 2

First

1 2

Last