The less for me the better for 3 reasons:

1) I like to invest in the stock market, so any money that could be taken away from that would be a bummer.

2) I am more interested in the competitive challenge

3) The whole giving my money to a person I havent met irl thing

Ok cool, I wont do it excessively (let me know if I am doing it too much)

$1k?

yeah I can do that

cliffs:

op finds multiple ways to stroke himself itt

op makes an extremely bad open and defend vs a 3b then gets it in as a 50/50 and posts it to 2+2

And people say poker is dead :P

Big Bwalz, any word yet?

If one of you is SerpaeTetra, I would like to inform you that you are a goddamn ****ing moron.

I'm just going to use this thread as a tilt punching bag to mock and call out all the "winning" players of this place that are in fact astoundingly bad at poker

I don't really get how it's possible that in 2018 I can be literally the only person on a website that understands the theory of SnGs and how they're supposed to be played.

All these regfish out here ACCUMULATIN' CHIPS like it's a ****ing MTT. Read a book.

honestly man, i can't afford to play the stakes you do, and I'm the one that posted the blinds and rake structures about how much I hate them. Tbh I don't want to play one of those games ever again let alone commit to a prop bet.As far as cash games, I'm not rolled close to your bi level there either.

I cant see any possible way of tracking cash games reliably, and stt's/mtts would be limited to sharkscope. I thought maybe playing at the same times so missed games would be same, but that'd have you guys on same tables too. Or you could say "x games" can go missing if that could be worked out, or maybe best "x% (maybe 80-90)" over a set time frame wins the bet? Thats the only way I can see it working with stts/mtts goin with the way the site operates now, and i cant find anything for cash games tracking to make it fair.

send me a pm and stake me ill start negotiations at 70/30 me lol

lol big_bwalz

You quit playing a game where there are no more than 3 good and another 5-10 vaguely competent players in the entire ecosystem.

It most certainly has to be the softest field of clowns on any website in any non-micro game since, maybe, 2008. I don't think your judgment is too sound.

;lasjfl;asjdfklasjf ok I'm sorry time to get off the computer

Ok no worries, maybe we can find something else to prop bet on in the future

ya that i can agree with with, my problem was most likely never made it past the 6$ games and cashed it all out and spent it before they changed the structures. Im he exact person they wanted to put put of business and i didnt adjust fast enough or have enough funds behind me to make it through the changes. Ill get it handled but im still struggling.

running bad? me too

after the 6$ games got wrecked i went down to the 2s and got tangled up with the clowns and ma'ers maybe but it never seemed shady to me. I cashed out 2k playing 6$ games n a clp months i guess i just ran good.

you are right thats not possible you are just running well or maybe something else? im not suggesting anything nefarious I think ur jsut a person like me with mental health issues as you've admited to thats bragging a lot and running good. Props to you

To sit n spin. You're buddy jaredpoker is one of the worst consistent winning regs I have seen online. He is just competenet enough to beat really bad players. Otherwise it seems he is oblivious to mistakes he makes and he just don't adjust to anyone differently. The addition of $50 and $100 hypers are a true blessing for him.

Heh, yeah, I'm just a tiltmonkey with emotional issues, that's all it ever is

He's not my buddy, I don't know him, just a guy I've played roughly one billion SnGs with But damn, I think there are at least 20 winning players according to sharkscope that are comfortably worse than Jared. I'm no genius, I could be wrong, but some of these guys, goddamn ...

I feel like I have two pretty substantial leaks, but every other player on here has 2 or more leaks as well. And some significantly winning players make multiple massive preflop blunders every game.

This is just gonna be the SnG **** talking thread from here on out. 2006 style baby.

The thing I love about Jared is how riled up he gets everybody. A guy actually created a Global account named "jaredpokersucks". I mean, that's just awesome.

And people talk mad **** about him in the games, too. Fish really hate the guy.

I am 98% sure that there is a big name, big time pre-Moneymaker legend of tournament poker that plays the bigger Global MTTs and occasionally the SnGs, mostly the 50+5s. I'm curious if other people have pieced this together as well ...

i wonder if jaredpokersucks is a multiaccounter. How does he know jaredpoker if he wasnt already on global lol.

Are the sngs really that juicy? I used to play them on PP a long time ago. I deposited on GP 2 days ago and I am crushing my normal game. may need to run some sngs on the side.

oops I guess this is what people were warning about when they said not to talk about how soft a game is

if you play after 3AM EST you should most definitely come in regardless of how competent you are, the games die HARD around then

it's probably that crazy ass Matt dude that used to post on here

That's how you know you've made it, when people are dedicating screen names to you.

So since BigBawlz is out, we going to play PLO 200 HU?

Nah im not doing PLO