as global loves to hide the hh's all while having suss things going on at above freq, about only way to keep these people honest is to record every session then eventually release the tapes pointing out the inconsistencies, how do u feel about that?

they wont even allow mucked hands that go to showdown to be seen if that isnt suspicious then i dunno what totell people.

If someone mucks their hand, why should you be able to see it? I know PS does it, but it doesn't seem right.

Tell us what you feel would represent a statistically significant inconsistency and I can better tell you how I feel about it.

I'm 50/50 about it. It's design in live poker IS to prevent cheating/make it easier to catch people who are softplaying each other, so using it to that effect online seems fine, but it's so rarely used live (and when it is it's nearly never for that goal) that at this point I feel like it's lost the point. I like being able to see people's hands because I can use that information better than most, but I understand the viewpoint of not wanting that feature. A compromise, like not showing mucked hands but having the ability to flag suspicious activity for a security team to review would be ideal but I have no clue if that's functionally possible.

The fact you think recording some sessions and then scraping some data on it tells me 1) you don't know anything about sample size 2) you don't know anything about data 3) you wouldn't be able to spot supposed inconsistencies if they kicked you in your ass. As always, if you think a site is suspicious, don't play it.

You can't fool me by creating a burner account, Sirbustalotz. Nice try.

You really think that’s me? Can a mod do an up check so hokie can sleep easier at night?

we are not the same person. u think some other regs at global havnt suspected the same thing they just dont post and make a fuss about it

get proofs / data on a decent sample. then complaints. not the other way around

i mean i see what you're saying, def some sick setup hands moreso than i see on other sites. but then again sample size, and the fact that your brains wired to pick up on patterns etc, it is obviously me being paranoid. it's not enough to make me stop playing there though, games are too soft and now with rakeback its a no brainer.

I have tried to reason, play the Devil's Advocate on this, even been running so cold where it felt like it was rigged against me.

To date, no one has shown any evidence of Global being rigged or it sets up hands.

The lack of hand history is to prevent data mining, and you can even opt out of sharkscope if you to "protect" your stats.

It is what it is. I rather play on a site with no database of hand histories where I know that no one has a HUD with all my data.

Also remember HUDs and RTA are also banned.

Generally when you are reviewing hand histories, there are only a few hands per 100(at most) worth reviewing. When you have a questionable hand, just use the feature under the dealer/screen to save the URL so can review it later.

Also remember you can write notes on players. I use 3 basic colors to identify types of players Green, Orange, Red, plus relevant notes.

same, ive been recording sessions with OBS, and using a notepad and marking the timestamp of hands ive got questions for and want to review, i then plug them into a program similar to gto wizard and see how bad i played them.

i like you also use notes, simple colors, reg, fish, and bad regs. makes my decisions a lot easier since im 12 tabling cash games, those colored notes go a long way.

My greens are fish, biggest adjustment is do NOT bluff unless I get a reliable timing tell like quick check and go for max value as they over call. Reds are generally tight players so my bluff frequency goes up because they over fold.

Also, for tournaments I have told its okay to use sharksscope while playing so I make notes based on that information.

I'm completely opposite with mine. In my experience in life, red = bad, green = good.

mines similar to jrod, green is the fish, purple is **** regs, and red is decent regs

dont worry global, i got some good session recordings to put out the the world at some point. keep up the skewjob. make sure they get AA anytime i have kk in plo. make sure fish make quads v top boat when its never happened in reverse. make sure bad regs or fish get another set over set in some fashion when it also has literally never happened in recorded video in reverse. make sure they never miss a flop in a 3b or 4b pot. make sure a reg i wouldnt even stake in a 5/10 live plo game because their overall style sucks wins another ai or gets another favorable situation.

sometimes after wsop time ill release the vids. I know ur reading this , your player base might be blind to it and most of your employees but the sharps are not. clean up your house before you get exposed and lose everything to try and eek out that 20% extra rake with the skew jobs

hmm im curious what these videos will show?

so you have compelling video of rigged online poker but you're going to wait till after the WSOP to show the evidence? Seems like this would be breaking news.. wouldn't you want to share this asap?

can never be compelling unless we had a higher up whistle blower on the inside or we get a physical copy of their slanted RNG. its just sessions that show the who what where when why of what i as one of the best players see thru my distribution their. All cards that flip face up before the river thats about only data points we can go on. so we can see how often cooler situation favor me or go against me,, how often the dog wins when i have it or when certain opponents have it ect. in a vaccuum it should be remotely even or in my case favor me in both as i am one of best players in the pool so i know when to holdem and when to foldem so to say.

Even without cards flipping up you know when someone is getting coolered or making a big fold in a spot. You know when a guy just got lucky for the 4th time in row as a fish or meh reg and dont pay them off. u can feel it.

my goal isnt to out the site as its a good site. A+ payments , nice software, good pool

i dont want the site to have bad PR, i just want a fair game for all that is all. if a fish is gonna lose at 30bb/100 let them lose at 30bb/100, if a marginal reg is gonna win at 3bb/100 let them naturally , let the natual order of things work itself out , do that and dont do jerrymandering.

once again if i am wrong and their is no slanted RNG i WELCOME global reps to prove me and the doubters wrong. they have the power to do so. why in the world they would not just put it some plan of action to prove to their pool that they offer a genuine product is beyond me outside of "just trust us guys"

they could have a independent monitor(that the pool choices) collect RNG samples at random intervals and analysis the outcomes and report to the player pool at that questions about xyz or better yet make all the data public so people can parse the data themselfs. that would silent all critics for good

I'm curious... Are you gonna include the hands where you are the one hitting the 2 outter on the river?

If you are a 90% favorite to win and you run it 100k times you will lose 9k times.

Let's not forget to mention that most people get it in preflop or after the flop. Then you see a runout.

This is an example... but you have ak on the button. Someone with 33 limps and you jam over the top.

He calls because he is a fish. Flop comes a k 6, turn 8, river 3. You lose. If you would have played a flop, do you really think he continues to play that board?

I think that is another reason we see so many bad beats, people on the site are generally weak recreational players who can't play post flop.

Red=Danger! Good Player or frequent check raiser, Green is a calling station so I have the green light to value bet, Yellow is caution because my sample is too small, Blue is passive, Purple is a bad player.

So you are absolutely clueless when it comes to plo and blame the site that you're losing because you're [over]playing KKxx the same way you would in NLHE.

Or it's an inside job against you.