Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Rake Discussion Thread Rake Discussion Thread

10-27-2017 , 11:09 AM
what they did unannounced with stts was very shady, and to not derail I feel that every single stt offered on the site is raked too high. Their unannounced, extremely unfriendly player changes as frequently as they make them has significantly offset their weak player pool imo in relation to profitability and appeal to put in volume there. A player pool that has more regs coming in all the time combined with games that are overly raked with no hud, also designed to be very high variance has made me re consider and re structure my play on gp.
10-27-2017 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by big bwalz
what they did unannounced with stts was very shady, and to not derail I feel that every single stt offered on the site is raked too high. Their unannounced, extremely unfriendly player changes as frequently as they make them has significantly offset their weak player pool imo in relation to profitability and appeal to put in volume there. A player pool that has more regs coming in all the time combined with games that are overly raked with no hud, also designed to be very high variance has made me re consider and re structure my play on gp.
+1, and it should. In every investment of time and money you should be diligent.
10-29-2017 , 07:59 PM
Sick amount of plo games you have going right now. Good thing your rake is low short handed so I'm incentivized to get tables going....
11-01-2017 , 06:37 PM
notice how they dont respond to this ? cant wait for their rake to slowly kill their player pool, oh wait it already has. #rakeitttt #wheretheGPadmins?
11-01-2017 , 06:59 PM
Sick no plo games running above 1-2. Maybe if you'd lower the rake shorthanded we'd be playing. Instead we all sit out. Only costing yourselves money
11-02-2017 , 11:59 AM
I woke up this morning to play on your site and get some games going, but to my surprise rake was still too high.
11-02-2017 , 03:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rutledge Smitty
I woke up this morning to play on your site and get some games going, but to my surprise rake was still too high.
Do you think about anything else in your life besides Global's rake structure? (Other than thinking about people like me who make stoopid responses to your posts.)
11-02-2017 , 03:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lagtight
Do you think about anything else in your life besides Global's rake structure? (Other than thinking about people like me who make stoopid responses to your posts.)
ON the contrary, I think this is a very polite way of shedding light on the issue. Carry on, Smitty.
11-02-2017 , 03:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lagtight
Do you think about anything else in your life besides Global's rake structure? (Other than thinking about people like me who make stoopid responses to your posts.)
How much are you down on this site? Trying to continue to keep this thread bumped as the rake is destroying the games either through not running or extreme bumhunting.
11-02-2017 , 03:54 PM
bump
11-02-2017 , 09:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lagtight
Do you think about anything else in your life besides Global's rake structure? (Other than thinking about people like me who make stoopid responses to your posts.)
I have to admit I find his persistence to the cause admirable. There have been some rake reductions recently at limits less than 1/2 so I don't believe apply to the people discussing it ITT

I keep passing on your views on this thread to the business and they are taken on board.
11-02-2017 , 09:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by flopflop
bump
I don't know if a bump is really required four minutes after the previous post. The thread was probably still quite high on the list.

I don't know what an optimal bump strategy is but I feel like bumping after four minutes means you are bumping too often and are probably exploitable.

Waiting at least 12 hours before bumping is probably a solid TAG bump strategy IMO
11-02-2017 , 10:51 PM
you are right that was a pretty weak bump didnt pay attention
11-02-2017 , 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlobalPoker_Joey
I have to admit I find his persistence to the cause admirable. There have been some rake reductions recently at limits less than 1/2 so I don't believe apply to the people discussing it ITT

I keep passing on your views on this thread to the business and they are taken on board.
Care to be specific?
11-02-2017 , 11:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by flopflop
Care to be specific?
% 2 Player 3+ Player 5+ Player

$0.02/$0.04 5.00% $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
$0.05/$0.10 5.00% $1.50 $1.50 $1.50
$0.10/$0.20 5.00% $2.50 $2.50 $2.50
$0.25/$0.50 5.00% $2.50 $3.00 $3.00
$0.50/$1 5.00% $2.50 $3.00 $3.00
$1/$2 5.00% $2.50 $3.00 $3.00

Sorry, I don't know how to make this format properly but it reads left to right percentage, 2 player rake 3+ player rake, 5+ player rake.

Last edited by GlobalPoker_Joey; 11-02-2017 at 11:52 PM. Reason: Format Fail
11-03-2017 , 12:05 AM
^^^^
Much appreciated
11-03-2017 , 12:40 AM
Well i guess its better than nothing but this will have very very little if no effect on rake paid in most cases.

will need to be like a 300bb pot at 20nl to pass the new 2.50 rake cap... (even more bb required to make cap at the lower stakes, this is mostly just an illusion of a change, still effectively uncapped rake)

and heads up u still get shafted... 50 cent discount at .25/.50 to 1/2 for pots over 60$... 3 handed no discount... cmon

what if we just quietly give everyone who posts in this thread rakeback?

Last edited by flopflop; 11-03-2017 at 12:50 AM.
11-03-2017 , 02:33 AM
If you aren't going to lower the rake we should at least get some of it back =)
11-03-2017 , 05:59 AM
in the old days, I don't think they capped rake at all at different limits. that's why my #1 priority at the time was to get up to 200nl or higher, where the rake had far less impact.

I never played/play shorthanded, but I guess some like it. it does seem like a sensible decision to lower the rake for them imo.
11-03-2017 , 08:41 AM
Higher than 1/2 rake reduction? Your low stakes games have alot easier time getting off as lower stakes, more players, people less aware that your rake shorthanded is highest in the business etc. Higher stakes it is getting harder to start tables (specifically talking PLO, but have noticed in NL as well to an extent). Lower the rake shorthanded at higher stakes or you'll continue to see a trend of games not willingly being started.
11-03-2017 , 09:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rutledge Smitty
How much are you down on this site? Trying to continue to keep this thread bumped as the rake is destroying the games either through not running or extreme bumhunting.
Thank you for confirming that all you think about in life is Global's rake.
11-03-2017 , 09:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlobalPoker_Joey
I have to admit I find his persistence to the cause admirable. There have been some rake reductions recently at limits less than 1/2 so I don't believe apply to the people discussing it ITT

I keep passing on your views on this thread to the business and they are taken on board.
I admire persistence in a great cause for the betterment of all mankind (oops, was that sexist?) such as lower rake. Power to the People!
11-03-2017 , 10:01 AM
bump
11-03-2017 , 10:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bozo7
bump
Please autoban anybody who bumps a thread less than 24 hours after the previous post.
11-03-2017 , 11:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lagtight
Please autoban anybody who bumps a thread less than 24 hours after the previous post.
I don't understand...do you want higher rake? There are many many many new 2+2 accounts posting on this sub-forum who may not even realize compared to other sites how high their rake is. I'm assuming you are one of those people as well. See you at the tables assuming you are out of the micros.

      
m