Quote:
Originally Posted by Rutledge Smitty
^what? The rake cap is one of the key components to this
Yes, for sure. I was just clarifying. The 5% rake that GP takes seems to be in line with the site's competitors. The difference is that the cap of total possible rake taken per hand is higher.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rutledge Smitty
Their rake is higher than competing sites.
In 2-3 handed games? Yes, rake cap (and thus, rake) is higher than competing sites.
In stakes $2/$4 and higher? Yes, rake is higher than competing sites.
In 4-6 handed tables, in stakes $1/$2 and lower? Rake is comparable/equal to competing sites.
-----------------
It's also worth noting that the cap is more relevant in higher stakes than lower stakes, as more hands are going to reach the cap in these games.
For example, it will take a 300 BB pot at $0.05/$0.10 to reach the cap, while it will take a 30 BB pot at $1/$2 to reach the cap.
Last edited by sam1chips; 11-22-2017 at 03:21 PM.