Quote:
Originally Posted by a dewd
You said they went through great lengths to deny hand histories.
If we're in a war of semantics here, how about reject? (Deny access to.)
If you're saying that it's actually OK because they said from the begining that they wouldn't operate with transparency... I have to disagree.
Them refusing basic access to our histories and stats was tell. Some chose to ignore it becuase short term, they were profitting... and here we are.
People with thousands stuck in their accounts, murky future and conflicting messages from a company we're supposed to trust with our BRs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by a dewd
No one breathing would believe that this was due to customer demand. It also gives credence to every tinfoil hat theory ......
It sure does, and perhaps they all weren't tinfoil hat theories. Perhaps people's theories rooted on companies choosing not to be transparent had legs in the first place?
We'll see, but it's not looking good for GP right about now.