Quote:
Originally Posted by glogga
That has nothing to do with it. Chess is played competitively and solvers haven't ruined it.
If chess had a third party that wins a piece of every match, so that in the event of a draw, both players lose and slim victories were turned into losses, chess would be dead as a hammer.
If chess had a rake, you would have to crush each opponent in order to win. Nobody would play against an opponent of equal skill because they would both be guaranteed to lose, the fish would get tired of being crushed and the good players would refuse to sit.
There wouldn't be any good games so the recreational player, stops playing, then the good players get tired of outplaying their opponent but booking a loos because they can't stay ahead of the rake. This is what is happening to NLH.
Just remember what Uncle Steamboat said and learn PLO.