Quote:
Originally Posted by owl_
I'm at 1,479 sngs tracked on Sharkscope. What's everyone's opinion on how many it takes to calculate win-rate? I've heard 3,000 sngs, 2,000, 10,0000....etc.
Also, my average ROI says 16%, but if I pull up the more in-depth stats, there is a total ROI figure which says 14.8%. Not sure why those numbers are different, anyone know?
16% over 1500 games tells you that you're a solid player. If your true ROI was -5% for example the chances of you running at 16% over 1500 games would likely be near zero. There's just always peaks and valleys. The tough thing with Global and determining ROI is that there you can't get your EV ROI so you don't always have an accurate idea how good or bad you're running.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerbrat2002
Have we battled?
I am very new to SNGs, can someone tell me what they think of my stats on SharkScope? It does seem like I am one of the better Regs at the 16 and 32 Hypers
I was playing 2/5 live semi professionally and randomly started playing Hypers and fell in love but most of my strategy is intuition with basicish push/folds
Pretty solid! Low sample size in hypers is scary, have seen a number of hyper regs over the years run hot for a period, make assumptions about winrate and then get absolutely demolished. Myself included!
Quote:
Originally Posted by lacky
Just looked at my sharkscope after not looking for 6 months or so. I had a spinning gold star with no idea what it ment. It took me to the leaderboards and how the hell I'm I so far up on them when I really hardly play? I've not played at all for months at a time, and half the time I have played has been cash games. Are those numbers even accurate? I would have assumed some of you have made far more.
They're real and they're spectacular. Very few good regs have their stats fully blocked so the Global leaderboards are going to be pretty accurate.