Quote:
Originally Posted by browni3141
There's no need to differentiate between hypers and non-hypers. Hypers are more swingy because there's not as much of a chance for a winning player to demonstrate an edge, so ROIs will be lower. If we already know our ROI then there is no difference between differentiating between hyper/turbo/regular.
That website just confirms that 300 buy-ins is ridiculously conservative. 1500 games is not enough to be confident in OP's claimed 10% ROI, but that's still a pretty solid result and we can safely guess that OP is at least a small winner. With $8k I see no reason not to be playing the $70s right now. I'd play with 100 BIs until he's more established.
Of course 100 BI downswings are possible, but extremely rare unless your ROI is like 1%. You're likely to have grown your bankroll significantly before such a thing happens, and if it does you should have already moved down to avoid busto.
A lot of people dont know how to shove and call correctly and thats a huge edge knowing how to shove correct. Super good on global bc only 3 mins of early game.
Roi changes depending on what type game. A 9 max reg wont know how to play a 6 max hyper. A normal 6 max reg wont know how to play a 9 max turbo as well or a hyper turbo.
Look at Hodler,Poker12, jaredpoker and I. All of us had a 100 buy in downswing. This month im down 700 abi 15 because I run like dog ****. That is almost 50 buy ins and I dont feel like moving up and down constantly. Tbf Jared and P12 have low rois but Hodler and I dont. Hodler was on a 200 downswing at the start. Maybe it was the higher games Idk.
Im gonna lay off hypers for bit bc I havent deposited yet after worldpay. My roll is 2500 on global. Im crushing normal 9 maxes and doing ok on 6 maxes.
Sorry if this msg didnt make sense Im tired af rn.