Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Global Poker SNG Discussion Thread Global Poker SNG Discussion Thread

08-02-2018 , 12:42 AM
Still no Headsup Sit and Goes standard or turbo speeds.... What is taking so long to offer these? I understand why they havent added cash game HU but no reason they cant havee sngs.
08-02-2018 , 02:25 PM
Thanks guys for your opinions re: live MTTs. I'm prolly heading up there today. If you see me playing SnGs tonight I stayed home

Quote:
Originally Posted by gpwhatacall
Im gonna opt out when I find my win rate
I'm probably gonna do what you and others have done and reset my stats regularly. I'd still like to have access to their stats on my account.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1loNgGr1ND
Wait, what's abi? Ru talking about the ability rating that ss assigns u based on ur stats?
I've spent a dumb amount of time wondering about sharkscope's ability rating and how they formulate it even though I understand fully well that it means nothing. It reallllly rewards people for playing higher stakes.
08-02-2018 , 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirbustalotz
Still no Headsup Sit and Goes standard or turbo speeds.... What is taking so long to offer these? I understand why they havent added cash game HU but no reason they cant havee sngs.
man, I liked to play huSnGs on Stars in the day but I feel that the player pool here isn't big enough to really support hu SnGs taking away from the 6m/9m pool
08-02-2018 , 03:11 PM
Not sure it's so much about liquidity as it is the predatory nature of HU games and how much faster they would deplete an average players deposit.
08-02-2018 , 04:29 PM
Yeah, that's a very good point; probably more important than my point

not gonna live donkament it up today, saving that for later this month when there are a bunch of pretty big events

if any of y'all are playing these MTTs in Cincy/Chicago/LVille hit me up
08-02-2018 , 08:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerONETWO
Thanks guys for your opinions re: live MTTs. I'm prolly heading up there today. If you see me playing SnGs tonight I stayed home



I'm probably gonna do what you and others have done and reset my stats regularly. I'd still like to have access to their stats on my account.



I've spent a dumb amount of time wondering about sharkscope's ability rating and how they formulate it even though I understand fully well that it means nothing. It reallllly rewards people for playing higher stakes.
Gl today.

You can get your stats back. When you reset it dosent erase your stats. It shows your stats from the day you reset and later.

Yeah same lol.
08-02-2018 , 08:44 PM
I think global should add a turbo 9m and a normal 9m for every stake and add a 35 and 75 6 max regular and turbo.
08-04-2018 , 12:59 AM
What is good bankroll management for hypers. Idk what I should be doing for it right now Im doing 5-30 on a 8k bankroll. This is what Im doing now.
10k to move up to 5-50s not taking out 5s because I sometimes cant get to 10 tables with out them
13k for the 5-70s
18k for 8-107
and 30k for 16-218s I will add in 55-218 turbos most likely and maybe the 9m 110 because some fish play 110s and I dont wanna miss out.
08-04-2018 , 01:23 AM
My mental game is **** so I tilt easy and poker is my 2nd job so make sure the bankroll management makes it so its hard 2 go broke. ty
08-04-2018 , 01:41 PM
I'm more conservative, but what you have is fine as long as you're very disciplined about moving down.
08-04-2018 , 02:15 PM
Ok ty. I might be more conservative as well because idk if I can deposit with the world pay stuff.
08-04-2018 , 02:16 PM
Did you notice any mistakes when I was playing against you?
08-04-2018 , 02:29 PM
No, but I play too many tables and I'm not very good to begin with so I wouldn't notice much anyway.
08-04-2018 , 02:33 PM
The answer can be vastly different depending on whether or not you've played enough to establish an ROI, or at least have an idea what your ROI might be. For 6-max having nearly 300 buy-ins seems super conservative to me. You'll just limit your growth this way.

It makes no sense to me to be playing $5 SNGs at the same time as $50/$70 SNGs. The lower stakes will just be a distraction. Play fewer tables at high stakes rather than add low stakes tables if you can't get enough high stakes tables going, or play multiple sites.
08-04-2018 , 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hodler
No, but I play too many tables and I'm not very good to begin with so I wouldn't notice much anyway.
Your still good imo. Youre better than most of the regs. How many do you play. I do 6-10.
08-04-2018 , 02:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by browni3141
The answer can be vastly different depending on whether or not you've played enough to establish an ROI, or at least have an idea what your ROI might be. For 6-max having nearly 300 buy-ins seems super conservative to me. You'll just limit your growth this way.

It makes no sense to me to be playing $5 SNGs at the same time as $50/$70 SNGs. The lower stakes will just be a distraction. Play fewer tables at high stakes rather than add low stakes tables if you can't get enough high stakes tables going, or play multiple sites.
When having downswings of >100 buyins is all but a formality (assuming you play long enough), then having an overall bankroll of 300+ really isn't that conservative.

I would just run some simulations in SwongSim (can find it on 2+2), and figure out what you're comfortable with. Doing that is the best way to visualize how bad things can get (they can get really bad over very long stretches ).

Quote:
Originally Posted by gpwhatacall
Your still good imo. Youre better than most of the regs. How many do you play. I do 6-10.
My issue is that I don't stop registering until I start timing out lol. I can probably do 10-12 without issues, more than that and it's a disaster.
08-04-2018 , 03:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by browni3141
The answer can be vastly different depending on whether or not you've played enough to establish an ROI, or at least have an idea what your ROI might be. For 6-max having nearly 300 buy-ins seems super conservative to me. You'll just limit your growth this way.

It makes no sense to me to be playing $5 SNGs at the same time as $50/$70 SNGs. The lower stakes will just be a distraction. Play fewer tables at high stakes rather than add low stakes tables if you can't get enough high stakes tables going, or play multiple sites.
my roi is 10 over 1500-1800 I havent checked yet. For hypers imo its not that conservative. I dont think I am because when I find my roi Im shooting for 300-800 games a day. I cant handle over 100x without tilting until I blow up with a lower bankroll lol.

A lot of the games I play will be micros/mids because the high 1s run slow and at night they dont run. If this msg dosent make sense its cuz I stayed up all night.
08-04-2018 , 03:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hodler


My issue is that I don't stop registering until I start timing out lol. I can probably do 10-12 without issues, more than that and it's a disaster.
Nice. I used 2 do that as well.
08-04-2018 , 03:08 PM
[QUOTE=hodler;54124649]When having downswings of >100 buyins is all but a formality (assuming you play long enough), then having an overall bankroll of 300+ really isn't that conservative.

I would just run some simulations in SwongSim (can find it on 2+2), and figure out what you're comfortable with. Doing that is the best way to visualize how bad things can get (they can get really bad over very long stretches ).

Ill check that out
08-04-2018 , 03:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by browni3141
The answer can be vastly different depending on whether or not you've played enough to establish an ROI, or at least have an idea what your ROI might be. For 6-max having nearly 300 buy-ins seems super conservative to me. You'll just limit your growth this way.

It makes no sense to me to be playing $5 SNGs at the same time as $50/$70 SNGs. The lower stakes will just be a distraction. Play fewer tables at high stakes rather than add low stakes tables if you can't get enough high stakes tables going, or play multiple sites.
I think they're talking about hypers, not regular 6m games. 300 buyins is indeed way way way too much for turbo 6m/9m

There's this old website where you can put in stake and ROI and ITM% and it'll spit out a conservative/loose/very risky suggested bankrolls based on Kelly Criterion: http://www.bankrolltools.com/

you can't differentiate between hypers and non-hypers; it's just something to look at for an estimate

I'll look at SwongSim too. Wow, that takes me back. Swongs they r 1 thing.
08-04-2018 , 03:38 PM
heh we are all resetting our stats

I'm gonna miss comparing graphs with other regs, but it just makes too much sense to not reset the stats ...

It is pretty interesting to look at 1 day sample sizes. Had a 10% av ROI and lost money because I got obliterated at the 160 hyper. Made me feel a bit better during a losing day
08-04-2018 , 03:43 PM
How can anyone say HU sngs are worse for the beginners than Hypers ill never understand. Its not true at all its just people here defending the games they like. Theres more variance in 6max sngs and 9max sngs then HU sngs. Also the site has plenty enough players to have HUsngs. Much smaller sites have them.
08-04-2018 , 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerONETWO
heh we are all resetting our stats

I'm gonna miss comparing graphs with other regs, but it just makes too much sense to not reset the stats ...

It is pretty interesting to look at 1 day sample sizes. Had a 10% av ROI and lost money because I got obliterated at the 160 hyper. Made me feel a bit better during a losing day
Wait, why is everyone resetting? Too lazy to read everything lol.
08-04-2018 , 08:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirbustalotz
How can anyone say HU sngs are worse for the beginners than Hypers ill never understand. Its not true at all its just people here defending the games they like. Theres more variance in 6max sngs and 9max sngs then HU sngs. Also the site has plenty enough players to have HUsngs. Much smaller sites have them.
It isn't about variance it's about edge. A good HU player can absolutely ruin a fish in short order and target him much easier than in a 6m or 9m game. The point is for the average players deposit to last longer.

Global has created their conditions very much on purpose (high rake, hard software to multitable, no hud, difficult lobby, no HU games). I highly doubt no HU games was simply an oversight.

I'm just trying to explain why I think Global would not have HU, not trying to cheerlead for my favourite format for God's sake.
08-04-2018 , 09:02 PM
Sng traffic all time low...

      
m