Quote:
Originally Posted by +EVillain
While I've never really been concerned about this rng or any other site's, I do see sketchy stuff in GP PLO lobbies that I can only attribute to collusion. Jreven I'm also fascinated by the accounts who always seem to be sitting 10-20BI, but even as many as 50 deep. This seems to be a plo "thing," but I agree sometimes it's just baffling how consistently the same accounts do this, using 75%-pot with every single line, sucking out on people over and over.
I imagine this must be just a part of omaha variance/dynamics in gneral, but even if this is the case I wish I understood it better so I could start running any4 and crushing the universe. Do all these players crash and burn in 10k hands? Sure seems like they should and I wish we could track them and find out, but at the same time it also feels like they dont, are we all supposed to be playing 80% of hands this way against passive pools? On sharkscope many of them are losing big, but some are just annihilating the site
why is 75% pot cbet proof of cheating? cbetting with that sizing is pretty standard in post solver/gto world in plo cash games.
10 BI on the table i've seen, but 50BI on the table??? Where, when, what stakes has this ever happened?
What stakes are you seeing people playing passively with 80% vpip? If I were colluding, I for sure would not be playing passively.
How do you know they are "annihilating" the site? I've been down 20bi, and have had 10 buyins on the table before.