Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Global poker is a scam with shills Global poker is a scam with shills

11-06-2021 , 06:29 PM
I was playing with him at the PLO10 table u mentioned and have also played with him in the past. That being said, I didn't notice anything fishy. He has definitely won a few hands against me but I don't mind losing to a better skilled player than me.....sometimes....

Just my 2 cents.
11-08-2021 , 11:38 PM
What’s your screen name if you don’t mind me asking? Skilled? Going all in with AT76 pre against an opponent that obviously has AA?
11-08-2021 , 11:55 PM
I’ll check the screen shot I took to see if your name is on there when I get home.

Quite ridiculous honestly…. Skill only get you so far. There is this thing called variance, especially in PLO, and the best players should lose ever now and again: not always be up 10 buy ins. And being up 20 buy ins is just quite ridiculous.. Five betting AT76 is quite ridiculous…. Actually the whole thing is quite ridiculous.

I have never seen such absurdity, even at the .01/.02 tables on other sites.. Especially by someone that plays so bad. Just ridiculous and obvious.. I am not sure if it is collusion or something else going on but there is something there. Gurts possible runlikethesun,. I just wish I could figure out how they are cheating….
11-08-2021 , 11:58 PM
Only thing I can think of is some form of super user… I know it sounds absurd but it has happened before on other sites… play at low limits where you can win a few hundred a day so you don’t draw that much attention.. something is just off! And you using the word skill is ridiculous.
11-09-2021 , 12:03 AM
And apparently his cheating only works in cash games because his sharkscope rating is a 52 over 500 hands. Again a 52…


Mine sucks and it’s only a 63 on global.. lol…

52 is just awful!
11-09-2021 , 12:06 AM
You guys gonna shut the hell up about a PLO10 player, or outing people's Sharkscope's anytime soon? Jesus Christ. So embarrassing.
11-09-2021 , 12:30 AM
degenerate gamblers have the most off-based assessments of how other people run.
11-09-2021 , 12:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jreven
I’ll check the screen shot I took to see if your name is on there when I get home.

Quite ridiculous honestly…. Skill only get you so far. There is this thing called variance, especially in PLO, and the best players should lose ever now and again: not always be up 10 buy ins. And being up 20 buy ins is just quite ridiculous.. Five betting AT76 is quite ridiculous…. Actually the whole thing is quite ridiculous.

I have never seen such absurdity, even at the .01/.02 tables on other sites.. Especially by someone that plays so bad. Just ridiculous and obvious.. I am not sure if it is collusion or something else going on but there is something there. Gurts possible runlikethesun,. I just wish I could figure out how they are cheating….
I played with you at plo10 over a year ago and the site wasn't why I had you marked as a weak player. For you to still be at these stakes after so much time, on a site as soft as Global no less, displays an incredible lack of skill and competence. That's not even including you outing people when you're not even sure what you're saying is true.

Get some coaching or better yet get some help in any way possible, because you legitimately sound like a disaster.
11-10-2021 , 11:01 PM
The better question is how do you know WHEN you played me? You track dates in your note fields? Just shut up! You would have to be blind or dumb to not believe that being up 10-20 buy ins on a regular basis wasn’t absurd and suspicious.

Nice way to try and redirect the conversation.
11-10-2021 , 11:14 PM
Love skunk…. Dont look in this post anymore,,, I am being serious and you are being a troll! Seriously up 20+ buy ins at PLO 20 and for it to happen frequently by an obvious bad player according to sharkscope. I mean he is the first player I have ever seen with a 52… a 52… so whoever told me to get a coach, I should be killing it since my score is so much better.

And I am up on the year at global (not as much as I should be) but that doesn’t mean there isn’t fishy stuff happening.. I choose to play elsewhere now because the only way to get better is to play at a site that is not like playing bingo.

And to beat PLO 10 on global all you should have to do on there is play weak passive because you get people that go all in pre flop with AT67…. But by some miracle the 3-4 outers get there 50% of the time.

Anyways all you naysayer find another place to post. I am being dead serious and I will call out whoever appears to be cheating.
11-10-2021 , 11:25 PM
And how do you know what you had me marked as? I haven’t played on there in a while? Is there a way to see notes you take on players without them being at a table or do you have it in a database somewhere?


?????
11-11-2021 , 02:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jreven
And how do you know what you had me marked as? I haven’t played on there in a while? Is there a way to see notes you take on players without them being at a table or do you have it in a database somewhere?


?????
Go away
11-11-2021 , 10:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jreven
Only thing I can think of is some form of super user… I know it sounds absurd but it has happened before on other sites… play at low limits where you can win a few hundred a day so you don’t draw that much attention.. something is just off! And you using the word skill is ridiculous.
https://www.reddit.com/r/poker/comme...ying_baccarat/

That's a heck of a good cover story for a super user. Secret agent stuff. Or they're a degen on a site full of the most passive players on the net.
11-11-2021 , 08:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relyhk
https://www.reddit.com/r/poker/comme...ying_baccarat/

That's a heck of a good cover story for a super user. Secret agent stuff. Or they're a degen on a site full of the most passive players on the net.
https://www.reddit.com/r/poker/comme...evb/?context=3

If this is the same guy, I almost hope he is super-using. Homeless, broke, and trying to grind it out at PLO 10.

Let's give the guy a break.
11-12-2021 , 01:22 AM
While I've never really been concerned about this rng or any other site's, I do see sketchy stuff in GP PLO lobbies that I can only attribute to collusion. Jreven I'm also fascinated by the accounts who always seem to be sitting 10-20BI, but even as many as 50 deep. This seems to be a plo "thing," but I agree sometimes it's just baffling how consistently the same accounts do this, using 75%-pot with every single line, sucking out on people over and over.

I imagine this must be just a part of omaha variance/dynamics in gneral, but even if this is the case I wish I understood it better so I could start running any4 and crushing the universe. Do all these players crash and burn in 10k hands? Sure seems like they should and I wish we could track them and find out, but at the same time it also feels like they dont, are we all supposed to be playing 80% of hands this way against passive pools? On sharkscope many of them are losing big, but some are just annihilating the site
11-12-2021 , 03:42 AM
I know I have been dominating 50 and 100nl, I just want to assure everyone I am 100% real and am not a bot that is kicking your butt.
11-12-2021 , 05:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +EVillain
While I've never really been concerned about this rng or any other site's, I do see sketchy stuff in GP PLO lobbies that I can only attribute to collusion. Jreven I'm also fascinated by the accounts who always seem to be sitting 10-20BI, but even as many as 50 deep. This seems to be a plo "thing," but I agree sometimes it's just baffling how consistently the same accounts do this, using 75%-pot with every single line, sucking out on people over and over.

I imagine this must be just a part of omaha variance/dynamics in gneral, but even if this is the case I wish I understood it better so I could start running any4 and crushing the universe. Do all these players crash and burn in 10k hands? Sure seems like they should and I wish we could track them and find out, but at the same time it also feels like they dont, are we all supposed to be playing 80% of hands this way against passive pools? On sharkscope many of them are losing big, but some are just annihilating the site
I don't know much about sharkscope, it's my understanding it only tracks tournaments and yet it is constantly referred to in discussions about ring games. Did sharkscope start tracking ring games?
11-12-2021 , 06:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +EVillain
While I've never really been concerned about this rng or any other site's, I do see sketchy stuff in GP PLO lobbies that I can only attribute to collusion. Jreven I'm also fascinated by the accounts who always seem to be sitting 10-20BI, but even as many as 50 deep. This seems to be a plo "thing," but I agree sometimes it's just baffling how consistently the same accounts do this, using 75%-pot with every single line, sucking out on people over and over.

I imagine this must be just a part of omaha variance/dynamics in gneral, but even if this is the case I wish I understood it better so I could start running any4 and crushing the universe. Do all these players crash and burn in 10k hands? Sure seems like they should and I wish we could track them and find out, but at the same time it also feels like they dont, are we all supposed to be playing 80% of hands this way against passive pools? On sharkscope many of them are losing big, but some are just annihilating the site
10K hands is a tiny sample size. If you're hoping poker justice to be done, and everyone to run close to EV after 10K hands, you're gonna have a bad time.
11-12-2021 , 06:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilly_
10K hands is a tiny sample size. If you're hoping poker justice to be done, and everyone to run close to EV after 10K hands, you're gonna have a bad time.
+1

Someone playing four tables at a time for even just five hours would see approximately 1K hands. So, in a mere week our multi-tabler would see approximately 7K hands.
11-12-2021 , 02:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by steamboatin
I don't know much about sharkscope, it's my understanding it only tracks tournaments and yet it is constantly referred to in discussions about ring games. Did sharkscope start tracking ring games?
afaik it's just sng/mtt's but it's the only data point I can find, I definitely used to think it was for every variant and see SC referenced to cash all the time yeah
11-13-2021 , 02:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +EVillain
While I've never really been concerned about this rng or any other site's, I do see sketchy stuff in GP PLO lobbies that I can only attribute to collusion. Jreven I'm also fascinated by the accounts who always seem to be sitting 10-20BI, but even as many as 50 deep. This seems to be a plo "thing," but I agree sometimes it's just baffling how consistently the same accounts do this, using 75%-pot with every single line, sucking out on people over and over.

I imagine this must be just a part of omaha variance/dynamics in gneral, but even if this is the case I wish I understood it better so I could start running any4 and crushing the universe. Do all these players crash and burn in 10k hands? Sure seems like they should and I wish we could track them and find out, but at the same time it also feels like they dont, are we all supposed to be playing 80% of hands this way against passive pools? On sharkscope many of them are losing big, but some are just annihilating the site
why is 75% pot cbet proof of cheating? cbetting with that sizing is pretty standard in post solver/gto world in plo cash games.

10 BI on the table i've seen, but 50BI on the table??? Where, when, what stakes has this ever happened?

What stakes are you seeing people playing passively with 80% vpip? If I were colluding, I for sure would not be playing passively.

How do you know they are "annihilating" the site? I've been down 20bi, and have had 10 buyins on the table before.
11-13-2021 , 04:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shanghai
https://www.reddit.com/r/poker/comme...evb/?context=3

If this is the same guy, I almost hope he is super-using. Homeless, broke, and trying to grind it out at PLO 10.

Let's give the guy a break.

It's me. Same guy. Forgot about this thread. I've never really seen jreven win before and have him marked as a LOLfish.
Yes I am a full on degen and lost everything using 0 bank roll management.and drugs lol. i'm grinding a 2 real job and moving into a new apt on the 15th.

Not a ****ing super user for the last time. Global is incredibly soft compared to GGpoker and honestly I've ran $500 stacks at PLO 20 many many times. It's not uncommon for me. The only reason Jreven is freaking out is he does not realize to get to that $500 stack at PLO $20 I've played for 6 hours lol.

I am seeking a PLO 25 stake cause I went busto. I'm trying to pay bills, and save every penny for Mexico. So a stake is needed. I've been staked before, sometime it is necassary.

Please stop making posts about me. It's cringe and a waste of everyones time. I don't need you guys figuring out my secret super using hackz!!!!1!11
11-13-2021 , 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jreven
Gurts - you are a crusher but looking for staking at PLO25? PLO 25? Also looking to play at GG Poker but you are an American player? Yeah, GG does not allow people that play from the US…. And you really want us to believe anything you have to say.

Yes that is correct sir. Please stop making posts about me J. You're a delusional player that is losing really bad. Instead of hyper focusing on what i'm doing, learn how to play ****ing PLO. PLO quickpro is a good read.

Admit you suck at PLO, and improve. Enough with the delusions man. It's honestly just sad to read at this point.

For anyone reading this thread, I am not a super user nor am I colluding. Simply put PLO micros on Global are pretty ABC 123 to beat. It's soft. As for collusion I've seen some sketchy **** but never anything worth taking note of.

Best of luck to all of my fellow grinders. Stay safe out there people. I'm not going to reply any more
11-13-2021 , 04:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +EVillain
Two years ago I was thinking to myself idk how omaha will surivive online, it just seems like it's the most vulnerable to collusion and the cheating software gets better and better
Gurtz how do you feel about the state of online plo rn? Are you planning on doing more live?
Online PLO is very very healthy rn. Not too worried about collusion/cheating.

Poker is alive and well.

I'll be playing a lot more Live poker once I have the $40k roll to handle 1/2/5 PLO variance in Austin Texas lol
12-06-2021 , 08:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugar420
Damn GURTS must be raking in at least $50 a day cheating the $10nl. BALLER!!!
Right? Laughable.

      
m