Quote:
Originally Posted by RalphWaldoEmerson
I don't know and cba to find out what sort of convoluted point you're making.
And yeah obviously with or without RNG concerns, idiots decide sites are rigged and pull their money off for all kinds of reasons. The fact remains that having a bad RNG would make players leave the site (it would seem at least, do you disagree?).
I agree? Thank you for bringing this to our attention in such a well thought out manner.
I think we may have some confusion in terms and be on the same side of this argument, but either way I will try to clarify my opinion in a clear and concise way
If the RNG is flawed, even badly, as long as it remains flawed, we simply can put it in the category of variance. Will it act different than "normal poker", sure. But fish are fish and will make bad plays regardless of the RNG correctness.
If the RNG is certified to be correct, what would keep Global from swapping out the good RNG for a bad rigged one? Does the cert company continue to certify the RNG? They likely spot check it at best, and I doubt they even do this.
So then is the RNG flawed?
My answer is, who cares.
Crooked companies are crooked companies, and can find lots of other ways to fleece the public. Legit companies are legit companies and will make mistakes, but aren't out to unfairly take advantage of people.
I personally don't think Global is crooked and is on the up and up. All of the above is theoretical discussion. But I still would never keep life changing money sitting on Global (I have other threads on this exact topic, of risk and investment). I leave there what I am comfortable with finding in the morning is gone and never to return. That way if it turns out I am wrong in my trust of Global. No harm no foul, I was comfortable risking that amount anyways. Welcome to life, investments fall out, and don't pan out. I move on.