Quote:
Originally Posted by be12
Easy lagtight! My intent was not to offend you. I know you and others here are very sensitive when it comes to Global. I do believe easy availability to hand histories would be a good thing for Global and the people who play there. I can't speak for other riggies (as you labelled me) but I would be interested in the facts, evidence and transparency that would come from the ability to review hands. So can you answer one simple question. What harm would having hand histories cause?
1. I was in no manner offended by your post. It was a good post, I thought.
2. I myself call out Global sometimes, so no, I'm not especially "sensitive" about Global. In fact, most of my play lately has been on a different site.
3. I did not label you a "riggie." There was nothing in your post that suggested to me that you are a riggie. Arguing for transparency does not make someone automatically a riggie.
4. The "harm" (so to speak) of HH is that HH's are used by good players to become better players. Global wants rec players, and too many good players might chase away too many fish.
5. Fine with me if they provide HH. I don't have a strong opinion either way.
6. Have a blessed day!