Ya what's wrong with you, are you some kind of idiot? How dare you lighten the banter with a joke?

THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS IN THIS THREAD WE HAVE A LYING, LOSING, PARANOID DONK CLAIMING SHADINESS AT AN ONLINE POKER SITE AND HE MUST BE STOPPED

Well if you are going to resort to 3rd grade name calling tatics, I will remind you that I am rubber you are glue

Also, I have no intention of rattling you. Someone that has dug in on their opinions , as you have, and has decided those opinions are facts are not easily shaken.

It is far better to barb them with sarcastic comments to point out the ridiculousness they promulgate. Because for them logic and thinking have been replaced by wishful thinking and when we want something to be true, we find very often that we see all of the "facts" we need for our case and promptly dismiss anyone or anything that disagrees with our beloved truth.

So my hope is the following and in this order:

1. The passive reader sees your position is insane.
2. You see that your opinion could be flawed.
3. Entertainment. Doesn't our world need more laughter?

And sarcasm is a great way of achieving those goals. Especially when others have done a great job pointing out the logical flaws already presented. No need to repeat them. You won't listen to them, why listen to me?

+1

For me personally, virtually 100% of the +EV of reading posts in this thread derives from their entertainment value.

Typical sequence:

1. Riggie makes the claim "Global is rigged" with little or no evidence.

2. Some smarty pants asks the riggie for more and/or better evidence.

3. Riggie says something like "runouts on Global seem funny" or details a few bad beats he saw yesterday.

4. Some smarty pants notes that the "evidence" is scanty at best.

5. Riggie accuses the smarty pants of being a paid shill.

6. The paid shill (in this case myself, since I get paid $50 per post) mocks the riggie so Global can keep the scam alive.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.


Full disclosure: I really am a Republican.

Is it like a multi-level marketing thing? Like if I sign up under you, can I also get paid

It has been well established in this (and many other) threads that you are already a paid shill, and this feeble attempt of yours to play the "Oh cool, maybe I can I sign up to be a shill, too" game is quite disingenious, and will be readily recognized as such from the discerning riggies.

3 times in an hour and a half the same guy flops a set or turns a set against my 2 pair or or AK top pair. Those odds don’t add up. This was a $1 $2 blind table.
This isn’t variance it is bs.

I see things haven’t changed much here

Yeah, except it actually is (somewhat) serious business. I don't blame you for not understanding that, since you are some random casual fish playing for the lulz, but others here intend to actually earn money playing poker on this website and do not wish to have you driving new players away.

"Those odds don't add up"

I always crack up when I see this; to think this way takes a complete and utter lack of understanding of logic, math, poker in general and all related topics.

Let me assure you that there is nothing inherently shady about having a strong hand lose to a stronger hand at a higher frequency than you think should be "average". Now read a book and get back on the 1/2 tables.

I see the homie Pokertalk posted the exact same post in the SnG thread. If he's complaining about taking these beats in <15bb stack games, then this reaches a whole new level of hilarious stupidity.

This is basically just admitting I have a convincing argument as no recs are frequenting this thread, let alone this site.

it's almost 2019 dog, 2p2 isn't some huge poker nerd secret anymore

Plenty of fish know about 2p2; I've even heard 50 year old weekend warriors in live games mention it.

regardless, I have no idea how you could know that no fish frequent 2p2 in general or this subforum in particular

Hell, I've READ POSTS IN THIS SUBFORUM from SnG players who are basically the biggest tournament losers on the site; people who have lost 30, 40, 60k on Sharkscope. If they aren't fish, then who is? I've also read posts from cash game players who I personally have a "fish" sticky on who almost certainly are massive losers in their games.

So, once again, you are just completely wrong about everything. Good day.

Do they have a certified RNG or not? Can someone show me the 3rd party that certified it or give me a phone number?

Been on Global for a while but was talking w friend who was adamant that no certification had been provided, I though it had. tyty

Posted many times in the thread, lost as to why they don't post it on their site.

I wanted to be able to look at my hand histories as at this point this site seems a bit fishy to me and wanted to be able to download my hand histories to look into it myself at minimum to put my mind at ease. Support said on 2 different occasions that they would forward it to the right department but never heard back from anyone. Is it possible to get downloadable hand history. As everyone who works here seems to be beyond ******ed.

No.

They won't give you a cash game history.

Only a win/loss report.

They're purposely obtuse when questioned and purposely refuse transparency with regards to hands played. (Along with banning downloading hands using any add-ons, etc.)

So, again... when someone could easily provide you something, yet refuses to... you should always assume there is a reason.

I'm actually really glad they don't allow hand histories or datamining for one reason. It keeps up the health of the games. All of the other suggestions by breakeven regs or slight winners looking for a HUD edge or to make the games better for them (rakeback) can take a hike too.

Global, continue to do whatever you can to make the games exciting and enjoyable for the recreational players and as tough an environment as possible for breakeven regs.

At a recent LIVE WSOP-C $400 buy in MTT. I was dealt AA, flopped a set twice in the same orbit, next orbit, repeat for a 3rd set AA.(3) times in less than 30 minutes. Look out...now the live WSOP circuit is rigged! What are we ever going to do now.

How does it keep the health of the games?

Play cash games on ACR (with huds and rakeback) for 2 weeks, and then compare and contrast

Hand histories don't have to enable HUDs. They can and should be anonymous.

I didn't say anything about rakeback.

Good to see you back. Still waiting... this is the 4th time I have asked... for proof that if they did release hand histories it would prove the site was legit.

I am beginning to think you can't, which is why you won't.

So if a person can't make a logical case to you on a sub forum, I should assume there is a reason.

Actually, they can't be anonymous. Sure they can blank the names, but it won't be hard to figure out who was whom on a site with as little traffic as global.

And if they did make them really anonymous and you couldn't tell who was whom, the integrity of the released hands could be questioned. What would keep a crooked site from just putting in hands that made the "variance" work out the way it was supposed. How could you prove those hands didn't take place? Impossible.

My point to Sound Poker (as you see me call him out for a 4th time for still not having an argument against my above argument), and everyone else here, it really comes down to one thing, do you trust Global.

If you do trust them, and you say you do when you play on Global, you have nothing to complain about. If you don't trust Global, don't play here. It really is this simple.

I mean, it's fairly obvious when you wake up with AA constantly that it's not random. Anyone who plays there knows what I'm talking about about. If I was winning, would I notice? Yes. Would I come on here to say it, probably not. I'll delete my post if you guys over at Global put me in with the winning crowd.