Subscribed for the comedy.

Is there a way to download a complete hand history? Never played on a site where you couldn't.

Not sure if you're being intentionally disingenuous, or if your reading comprehension is that poor. An "RNG discussion" has nothing to do with "superusing, hacking, cheating, botting, collusion and general poker site shadiness and greed". No one has said "such things are not only unlikely, you're an egomaniacal idiot for thinking they can happen", or anything remotely close to that.

And I like the way you lump rigging into that list as if that suddenly makes it a legit problem that's been known to happen multiple times like everything else you listed.

I didn't actually include rigging into that list, but just curious why you think rigging is somehow out of the question?

We have had poker sites that are represented by famous public personas intentionally, blatantly, and willfully just stealing peoples deposits in the tens of millions of dollars. What makes you think a rigged RNG is out of the question? Wouldn't the subterfuge provided by it be even more incentive to do it?

I have no idea if the RNG at Global is rigged, and I haven't really made the claim that it is. I just know something is off there.

This.... Is perhaps one of the dumbest ways I've ever heard variance explained. Also, saying you have a 50% chance to win at the river... I can't even.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Haha dead site that has multiple 10/20nl every day

Read the beginning of the thread to understand.

I was not explaining variance, I was stating if you and I go to the river, I will win or lose. Since there are 2 of us at showdown I have a 50/50 shot. I either win or lose.

lol, thank you

It's true that the ridiculously inevitable happened and the games became a bit tougher as various superfish went busto, but this place is still pretty great.

Signed,
Global Poker CEO poker12

p.s. for whatever it's worth, my general opinion is that there are only maybe 5 guys that regularly play 200 and 400nl that could be classified as a "very strong reg", and all the other regs are like yours truly in that they are just meh players that make mistakes constantly. If you count somebody as a reg or tough player merely because they are 100+bb deep then you are the fish.

he's just messing around, it's the old 2p2, "the odds are 50/50, you either win or you don't" troll

Um...


I've never suggested such a thing.

What I'm saying is that you threw "rigging" into a list of other things that have been proven many times to be going on at many sites - unlike rigging, which I don't believe has ever been proven to be happening at any site. That's not to say that it never has happened, or that it never could, but to equate it with all the rest, or throw it in with all the rest and make it into a "we still have people in 2018 saying such things are not only unlikely, you're an egomaniacal idiot for thinking they can happen" strawman, is ridiculous.

Ok well I shouldn't have included it into the list. My bad.

I personally think some RNG rigging is the least likely chance to be what's going on. It's way more likely (don't ask me why) that certain people have cracked the software somehow (see hole cards, see what's coming) and that just makes the RNG 'appear' rigged.

I play 200nl-600nl every day and havent suspected anyone in the slightest of having cracked the software

Surely they would be taking advantage of this at these stakes or higher rather than 25-50nl

Cool. I've had multiple PMs from people that play those stakes and higher (PLO though) that think there is.

And since no one lies on the internet, now we have proof positive of your claims!

It certainly goes without saying that the natural behavior of the bulk of higher buy in Omaha regs on this site when spotting an easy to prove super user would be to flock en masse to PM this guy, who will do his best to make sure that none of the details of their concerns are ever shown or proven. That certainly makes a lot more concerns than posting specifics here (liek was done with UB) and doing some rudimentary tests to document it, such as stream a few videos to show the play and announce them in advance so people can see them live, the person does not even have to play just observe from the rail.

I believe government officials will be secretly leaking information to him next. Hope he keeps space in his PM in box to handle all of this, given how important a nexus he is according to him.

ok screen shot it and black out the username if you want, or any other info. just show the relevant info.

why would they PM you instead of someone that can actually do something? they gain literally nothing by PMing you

like i said before... just imagine the ego it takes...

LOL ya next thing you know robert mueller is sending the findings of his investigation to Do0rDoNot

Yes you are right, and that was the first line in my post, that I was trolling.

Top set got outdrawn by rivered quads 3 times today, one of them was runner runner quads for an underpair

Also got it in nut flush over baby flush with a straight flush blocker and got one outered...duh duh duhhhhhhhh, on the river again.

The odds of that happening in a couple thousand hand session are astronomically low.

Anyone who thinks this site is legitimate is a shill or worse.

i think this site is a joke from what i have played but you have literally posted no evidence for any of your issues lol

He sent himself a PM once, so that counts for something.

Yup - he had an opportunity to show us PMs from high-stakes PLO players who supposedly agree with him; instead, he posted more bad beat stories.

If you have high-stakes PLO players who agree with you and can easily prove it, why would you continue to post anecdotal bad beat stories?

I suspect he didn't think it through when he claimed to have those PMs. When confronted for evidence, which can be easily shown with a couple of screenshots editing out usernames/any other private info, he conveniently ignores those asking for the evidence that he claims to so readily have.

This is a guy who responds to every single post that calls him out on his pointless anecdotes, but he of course conveniently doesn't respond the one time that he can actually provide something tangible that could further his case.

Do0rDoNot - nobody gives a **** about your bad beats, lets see those PMs from the high stakes PLO players who agree with you.

You ignore legitimate questions and instead opt to post more bad beat stories

Do0rDoNot claims that anyone who disagrees with him is a shill

Is it possible that Do0rDoNot is a shill for a competitor poker site??????

I can play the accusation without proof game too