Does it shock anyone that "Online poker is rigged" guy is also "Vaccines are harmful" guy?

Not at all, and that is why I asked him his thoughts on 9/11. If he follows his trend then he will simply say that he is open to discussion and considers all sides, which is what riggies who lack the courage to stand behind their riggie beliefs say to avoid the paranoid riggie/conspiracy guy/ tin foil hat labels. I kind of respect those that go full out on their crazy - at least they are proud of their beliefs, whether they are grounded in reality or not.


The flat Earthers would disagree with you and likely say something to you like the following:

In fact, on their Wiki page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern...arth_societies

Here is a quote

"They claimed a prevailing problem of the new technological age was the willingness of people to accept theories "on blind faith and to reject the evidence of their own senses."

Sees you and they think in the same way.

So, given your beliefs about vaccines, what are your thoughts on 9/11? I will be nice and spare asking you if you also consider both sides on some of the really low end conspiracies found on shows like Infowars, simply because people who share those beliefs should not be spoken to at all, and by definition they can never be a source of entertainment.

All the best.

lol@ you guys thinking Im a vaxxer. Thats awesome.

You never know. It is simply an observation. No real need to discount it.

So, what are your thoughts about 9/11? Interesting that you keep avoiding the question...

All the best.

J Edgar Hoover did it.

I completely understand why you do not want to share your genuine feelings about 9/11 or other conspiracies, and of course I ask you for them knowing you will avoid doing so. Was pretty strange that you opened up about your anti-vaccine friendly thoughts, and even tossed in essentially a you never know "I can't prove it" disclaimer about the moon landing, but odds are you will not make similar mistakes like that in the future . That whole process helps give a clearer picture of your general outlook on spooky unproven rigs in all things, or as you prefer to put it - you like to keep your options available with an "open" mind to all possibilities.

All the best.

lmao! I hated you at first but you are a funny guy.

Threads like this are all about having fun, because no riggie theory in many, many years has ever been proven, so once we all accept that the foundation is riggies make up stuff (or say they are simply saying their concerns) and others have fun at their expense (or waste a lot of time trying to be logical with them) then a good time can be had by all. That is why I ask you about relatively tame conspiracies ( I would not have asked your thoughts on vaccines for instance as Bobo essentially did), and avoid the nastier ones that exist these days, because you having an open mind to some of them would be no fun at all, so correct to just not ask you.

All the best.

A "vaxxer" means you get your children vaccinated. An "anti-vaxxer" is someone who doesn't. Freudian slip?

LOL.

There are a lot of people out there who think they are being smart by constantly being "skeptics". Pros and cons need to be weighed, good arguments on both sides, etc., etc. So much smarter than those "sheeple" who believe everything they're told.

And of course in general, it's good to be sceptical and question things. But that doesn't mean that all evidence or arguments are equal. Just because a bunch of people spend hundreds of hours creating Youtube videos about 9/11, moon landing, anti-vaxx, and rigged poker conspiracy theories doesn't make them credible.

"good arguments on both sides" of the vaccine debate? LOL. I didn't mention that to start a debate about it, but your reply fits in with other posts of yours, and says a lot about your "skeptic" mindset. This whole quads nonsense is a great example of this flawed mindset. When shown the probability calculations that disprove your contention that they happen too often, you can't simply admit you're wrong and drop the subject - you keep coming back to it again and again, talking about your "observations" and how they can't be proved or disproved, and you're not saying for sure that there's a problem, but gee it sure seems like there might be, all the while making no mention of the fact that it's already been shown not to be a problem.

There is no socratic elenchus in discussing the value of vaccines. Today's reality make any attempt a logical fallacy carried on by fools. At least with the conspiracy to rig the RNGs, the lack of understanding of probability, standard deviation, and/or statistics allows for leeway. Vaccinations though....arguing against them is announcing one's stupidity.

I agree 10,000%. Anyone that listens to Alex Jones thinks they know what the rest of the world doesn't and that they are idiots for not knowing it (Boston Marathon hoak, 911 Hoax, Shape Shifting lizard people, etc etc). They don't see their stupidity in believing everything that the general public accepts as conspiracy theory.

There are examples of them being right though. At one time it was an accepted medical fact that dietary fat would cause heart disease and should be avoided at all costs. Now we know that is not true and in some cases it is the opposite of the truth.

My personal, very limited of deep knowledge in the science of it, opinion is based on my childhood. I had chickenpox and the measles growing up and it didn't come close to killing me. I missed school for a couple days and now I am fine. My immune system is stronger than most people's I see regularly. I am very rarely sick. When I do catch a cold I recover quickly. I used to drink like a fish, smoked a pack of cigarettes a day and recreationally used every drug known to man. To this day I still have a pretty good immune system. I believe it was because as a kid I have those "deadly" illnesses that kids today avoid by getting immunized. There is a proven benefit to being exposed to germs in the form of a stronger immune system.

So I'm not anti-vaxxer or under the belief that it causes autism (nor that it doesn't). I just believe there is an individual benefit avoiding a bunch of vaccinations and a society benefit by having everyone get immunized. To this day I do not use anti-bacteria soap because I believe there is a benefit to being exposed to germs. It's natures immunization. Without the accompanying ingredients of aluminum and Formaldehyde.

It doesn't. There have been many large studies since Andrew Wakefield's fraudulent retracted one, and all of them have found no link whatsoever between the MMR vaccine and autism. This is a 100% settled issue and not a matter of opinion or debate. It's way, way more settled than whether everything about Global's RNG is on the level.

Oh man, those are Deadly Chemicals and Heavy Metals!

Sodium is another Heavy Metal! It reacts violently with water. You don't want that anywhere near your body, right?

Oh, and don't get me started on Chlorine. Chlorine is a Deadly Chemical that is highly POISONOUS!

I'm sure you keep both Sodium and Chlorine far far away from your body, right?

You can use this as an advertising campaign plan for marketing Anthrax pills. Start that company and then you can say that you are not only a client, but also the president.

So, what are your thoughts about 9/11? Also, you seem pretty familiar with Alex Jones' work, how often did you listen to him, you know, for research and keeping an open mind purposes.

All the best.

You are comparing essential minerals with potentially toxic ones. There is no daily requirement for Formaldehyde. There are daily requirements for sodium. Also Chlorine, while not very toxic to the body is very toxic to gut flora which a lot of research says plays a big factor in our health. So um yeah......

I think dirty middle eastern scum flew plans in to buildings on 9/11. Intense heat from burning plane fuel caused the buildings to collapse.

Do you believe they were vaccinated?

Anyway, some truther sympathetic people playing the skeptic game would simply tell you something like that they read the arguments on both sides and can't make a decision because there's good arguments on both sides. It's called making rational judgments after looking at available evidence and not assuming one is 100% right or 100% wrong without hearing both sides. It's a great way to live. You should try it.

All the best.

They probably never saw running water until they came to the US to train as pilots better yet been vaccinated.

Thanks for the advice. You are definitely of great intelligence by saying something like that. Einstein level.

Given how much you embrace the advice, and consider it wise, your next step is to go to a 9/11 thread (plenty on the internet) and tell them that you are completely open to their thoughts and beliefs. Do the same with the flat-earthers and lizard people believers and the rest. Basically, do with them what you expect others to do with you after you make up and complain about seeing lots of quads. Let us know how it goes.

All the best.

You say lizard people believers as though lizard people don't really exist. Be careful, the lizard people have ways of finding you. If they've infiltrated Global Poker, you may find yourself facing a string of "bad beats by quads" for your insolence. You have been warned.

Playing in the $10,000 guarantee on Global. First time back in months. I will definitely report my findings on the RNG and report back.

I hate that ****ing site with a passion. It loves rewarding the fish. In 10th out of 280 with over 500 entrants. This donk who is like 18th place is shoving everything. I have AA. I call he has AT. Of course he hits 2 10s. Then I'm short stacked and another agro fish shoves A8 with 40bbs still mind you. I call with AK and lose of course.

That site can shove their free tourney tickets up their ***. If you are horrible at poker that is the site for you. The RNG will make sure the good players can't bully you. They will save your donk *** everytime.

Where we at with the moon landing?

Some irony with you calling someone else a donk.