Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Global poker legit? Global poker legit?

09-08-2021 , 12:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Braun
He's the guy that got banned on 6/5/21 the day before you "created" your account on 6/6/21. Kind of babbling about rigged nonsense with poor grammar and hostility towards global management.
Lol. Nice catch. A mod can see if IP is the same....

Seems like the odds are pretty high
09-08-2021 , 02:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
Yeah most people are fish in more ways than one I get it man. Still a strawman defense. I don't care about other sites and what they do I don't care about other people and how they use the hand histories or not.
But most people also haven't given global hundreds of thousands of dollars in rake either. If they're clean they will give us the hand histories it's simple. Hand history collection is literally the only tool regs have in detecting collusion in detecting bots in detecting real-time assistance in detecting skews in RNG.
No, it is NOT that simple. A site not providing HH is NOT a sufficient condition for claiming that a site is not "clean."

If you have any doubts whatsoever about the integrity of GP, then don't play there.

I've played on Global for several years with no issues at all.

Having said that, Global might vanish into the netherworld tonite, and I will be out $32.

My SN on GP is chuckychess
09-09-2021 , 04:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
U can have doubts and still play their.
Nobody with at least as much sense as a housefly should play on any poker site if they have any serious doubts about the integrity of the site.

Quote:
Global knows this. It's just a simple ev question hence why I said everyone is happy. I have never claimed they send in unbeatable house players that swoop in and steal everyone's bread.that obv isn't the case.
They just make sure a certain pool get their money's worth.
It is in the site's best interest to provide an enjoyable playing experience for their primary target audience; which in the case of GP are the recreational players. Hence, no HUDs or HHs.
09-09-2021 , 10:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
U can have doubts and still play their. Global knows this. It's just a simple ev question hence why I said everyone is happy. I have never claimed they send in unbeatable house players that swoop in and steal everyone's bread.that obv isn't the case.
They just make sure a certain pool get their money's worth.
*there
09-09-2021 , 05:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
Ask David this dude wouldn't even be able to tell us with a str8 face their not tinkering with the deck.he knows it.

Lagtight just stop dude ur a micro player at best ,I am one of the biggest winners on the site and off it. I literally have won more in poker that everyone itt combined. I most likely have been around longer than anyone itt as a pro. I have played the biggest stakes itt both live and online. I know the math side ,experience and gto side of the game better than anyone itt. I also know the frequency of stuff occuring or not for and against you. This place has an obv skew. Your opinion is invalidated when I start talking.
Lol. You're an asshat riggie. Stop.

I could believe you could fly though, impossible for all that hot air to stay ground level.
09-09-2021 , 05:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
Ask David this dude wouldn't even be able to tell us with a str8 face their not tinkering with the deck.he knows it.

Lagtight just stop dude ur a micro player at best ,I am one of the biggest winners on the site and off it. I literally have won more in poker that everyone itt combined. I most likely have been around longer than anyone itt as a pro. I have played the biggest stakes itt both live and online. I know the math side ,experience and gto side of the game better than anyone itt. I also know the frequency of stuff occuring or not for and against you. This place has an obv skew. Your opinion is invalidated when I start talking.
Why does every bad player talk like this?
09-09-2021 , 06:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
Ask David this dude wouldn't even be able to tell us with a str8 face their not tinkering with the deck.he knows it.

Lagtight just stop dude ur a micro player at best ,I am one of the biggest winners on the site and off it. I literally have won more in poker that everyone itt combined. I most likely have been around longer than anyone itt as a pro. I have played the biggest stakes itt both live and online. I know the math side ,experience and gto side of the game better than anyone itt. I also know the frequency of stuff occuring or not for and against you. This place has an obv skew. Your opinion is invalidated when I start talking.
lets see some numbers boss
09-09-2021 , 10:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
numbers are < than urs. U want bank statements or my social. U get all butthurt too boss. Look how defensive the micro playboys are getting imao.
So your numbers are less than his? You’re not making yourself look any smarter.
09-09-2021 , 11:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
numbers are < than urs. U want bank statements or my social. U get all butthurt too boss. Look how defensive the micro playboys are getting imao.
you're just not very interesting or even unique. super cool new name talks about winning millions so he KNOWS the site is fake. what is even the point in posting? r u warning people? bragging? it just doesnt matter at all.
09-10-2021 , 03:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
Ask David if it's legit I'm sure he won't be bashful.
What do ur eyes say. Problem is that depends on if your eyes can even comprehend what's occuring on the screen and seeing that most players have zero clue they cannot make a proper assessment so they blindly fall in line

So do you think a business that circumvents US law will always give you a fair game even when maybe it's not in their best interest to do so. Inaddition This form allows zero criticism what's that tell you also.

It's interesting that mods will ban people for questioning the legitimacy of a poker room of which they've never personally played a single hand on. This post will prolly get deleted by the top brass to prove my point about not allowing open and honest discussion.
2+2'rs questioned the legitimacy of Full Tilt and were instrumental in exposing the Hole Card scam. I do not remember anyone being banned for participating in that process, but they had like facts & stuff, you know.
09-10-2021 , 03:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
It's like me trying to argue with Linus what's the best play for xzy incessantly.
If Linus came in here making accusations with literally 0 evidence I'd ask for proof or GTFO.

You can keep your earnings to yourself. Showing everyone you're a 7-8 figure winner or whatever you're implying wouldn't be evidence. Your opinion has no value on this topic if you have nothing to back it up but vague feelings.

When these types of accusations come with substantial evidence they are taken seriously. When they don't they are not. It's that simple. No one cares who you are.
09-10-2021 , 04:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
Ask David this dude wouldn't even be able to tell us with a str8 face their not tinkering with the deck.he knows it.

Lagtight just stop dude ur a micro player at best ,I am one of the biggest winners on the site and off it. I literally have won more in poker that everyone itt combined. I most likely have been around longer than anyone itt as a pro. I have played the biggest stakes itt both live and online. I know the math side ,experience and gto side of the game better than anyone itt. I also know the frequency of stuff occuring or not for and against you. This place has an obv skew. Your opinion is invalidated when I start talking.
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
09-10-2021 , 04:54 AM
BoboFett is a pro. We are disrespecting his authority and brilliance by asking him to provide evidence for his beliefs.

I understand why he is frustrated trying to share his deep insights with a bunch of no-nothings like us.
09-10-2021 , 08:25 AM
I genuinely hope BoboFett really is a crusher. It's legit terrifying to me that a person would come to an anonymous forum, post nonsense about being a crusher, have everyone in the thread call out the nonsense, and then sit there thinking...what? "This is what it would feel like to be really great at something and get to prove my superiority?" And somehow feel positive validation from the experience.

Would much rather Bobo be a crusher than a lunatic.

"...but at a certain point you need to defer." --at what point should we be deferring to your experience and knowledge, that you have done nothing to prove? Or should we defer to everyone on 2+2 who claims to be a crusher at the highest stakes? Cuz I might run out of defers
09-10-2021 , 09:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
just not interesting
09-10-2021 , 02:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
What possible evidence could we have when they don't allow hand history collection that would convince you 100%.lets get real here.
They don't allow hand history collection so they can have plausible deniability it's simple.
Outside of hand history data or internal memos I'm literally the next best source to judge the validity of the site. So you can take it how you want to once again it isn't going to matter. The sick part is most people in this thread are probably getting the good end of the skew LOL. So they don't want to believe that they're breakevenish results would actually be losing if there was no skew
You really are full of yourself aren't you? You're also not very good at reading.

Someone with an illegal HUD, caught and banned, took questions over severall days from anyone re HH and occurrences/violation of standard deviation. Zero. He said zero signs of anything off. Things like facts will never sway the citizens of Rigtardia. You will continue to whine and claim superior something or another.

Even you know you're a blowhard. People respond laughing at you. The newest of noobs would never give you any credence. You are far from anyone that is the best source for anything poker related.

Be interesting to have a mod check your IP and see how many accounts you've had here. Your posts belong in the riggie thread. Or trash pile.

You just continue to make a fool of yourself.
09-10-2021 , 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
Did you play back then buddy because I did. The site started off clean in my opinion then eventually went rogue. The whales back then would get slaughtered like they do in every live game because it was a real untouched deck. You ever see whales win with the same frequency they do online in a live game obviously there's different variables but come on. I'm sure every fish just got better and I'm sure that even though we play more hands online and shorter handed which should equal fish busting faster online than live but yet it's the reverse.
I remember reading the thread I don't recall any data analysis of what I'm trying to point out.
The skew is in layman's terms bad players run much better now then they statistically should v the proven better players it's that simple. This helps prevent them from going bust too fast and keeping games up and running. But like I said in the end it doesn't usually matter cuz they usually end up losing their stack anyways it just takes longer than it normally would have. Site implements a handicapping system. Which would easily be pointed out and they know this if they ever allowed hand history collection which is why David will never allow it he can prove me wrong right now and say they'll allow it he won't
Global Poker RNG discussion thread. I'm sure you've been there. Prior poster with similar stubbornness and manner of speaking anyway....

Search for HUD and scroll through the post it finds. Someone stayed around answering questions.

I played on Global since they started almost. I have not played on a site that someone has not decided it was rigged in some fashion. Naturally, like you they never post any evidence. IF someone was winning and they figured out a rig, well...let's just say they'd be pretty silly to complain about it or share it with anyone else.

While riggies chase the boogeyman of rigdom sans evidence, they have no knowledge or concern over actual real issues such as collusion and betting. Feel free to see the thread I made outing a boring and helping to recover 7 figures in player funds.

I'm happy to admit I do not have the expertise to studying HH for aberrations but I can point to a handful of extremely smart people that do just that. Doubters were comfortable with the banned player's reporting of different hand scenarios. They did not say a single riggie nor will logic or math ever do that.

As someone that has private clubs and games, of you want to rig it then the way the house makes the most money is by pots hitting the rake cap and not going over it. Action rig, weak player rig, preselected winner rig, etc... all have the same thing in common as the Easter bunny or claim to be one of the winningest players on X site. The common theme is it's all fantasy and doesn't exist.
09-11-2021 , 11:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
I think I should argue more with people who haven't played a single hand on the site or people who haven't played a hand above $0.10 cent .25 cent
Maybe u guys know better than me for what I'm describing is occurring
Even if GP provided HH, that would do virtually NOTHING to silence the Riggies. Don't take my word for it: EVERY poker site, INCLUDING those with HH have many players utterly convinced that the site is rigged.

By the way, bragging about how great you are and how you are better than everyone else here at poker is literally meaningless unless you doxx yourself. DUCY?
09-12-2021 , 01:59 AM
I'd lay 3-1 that i know who BoboFett is on Global. Idk if they have shared their screenname, so I won't.

If I'm right, he/she isn't terrible. Being the most winning player ever on Global? That I'm not sure.
09-12-2021 , 07:40 AM
Been reading this thread for a few days. I think I know who bobo is as well. I might be completely off, but I have it pinned down to 2 people who were big winners on global for a few years then started going down hill recently.
09-18-2021 , 08:07 AM
I won’t call GP skewed, but holy fruitcakes batman did I just have a wicked downswing.

100 PLO: for 26 hands over 2 days where I had $100 or much more preflop or post flop with 70/30 or greater (many 85/15, 1 95/5), I lost every single one.

I only got it in where I was the major dog 3 times, and won those…

Sick beats, but, it is what it is. I suck at PLO, obv.
09-27-2021 , 10:22 AM
Hand histories would definitely help provided proof either way. All in EV over a large sample would be the best measure.

So why not? They already have some sort of database in place to provide hand histories that works sometimes.. The only thing they would need to do is make it where you can download it in a txt or xlm file.

So again, why not?
09-27-2021 , 05:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jreven
Hand histories would definitely help provided proof either way. All in EV over a large sample would be the best measure.

So why not? They already have some sort of database in place to provide hand histories that works sometimes.. The only thing they would need to do is make it where you can download it in a txt or xlm file.
Even if GP provided HH, that would do virtually NOTHING to silence the Riggies. Don't take my word for it: EVERY poker site, INCLUDING those with HH have many players utterly convinced that the site is rigged.

Quote:
So again, why not?
It is in the site's best interest to provide an enjoyable playing experience for their primary target audience; which in the case of GP are the recreational players. Hence, no HUDs or HHs.
09-27-2021 , 05:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lagtight
It is in the site's best interest to provide an enjoyable playing experience for their primary target audience; which in the case of GP are the recreational players. Hence, no HUDs or HHs.
I think online poker is much more enjoyable with a HUD.
09-27-2021 , 09:53 PM
This is kind of a pointless argument either way without being able to download hand histories there is no proof either way unless someone wanted to watch and input hands into a database.

My take on the site - I have seen some real questionable play.. It might be variance it could be something else.

Anyone have enough time to datamine a few hundred thousands hands into poker tracker to solve this debate?

      
m