Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
Did you play back then buddy because I did. The site started off clean in my opinion then eventually went rogue. The whales back then would get slaughtered like they do in every live game because it was a real untouched deck. You ever see whales win with the same frequency they do online in a live game obviously there's different variables but come on. I'm sure every fish just got better and I'm sure that even though we play more hands online and shorter handed which should equal fish busting faster online than live but yet it's the reverse.
I remember reading the thread I don't recall any data analysis of what I'm trying to point out.
The skew is in layman's terms bad players run much better now then they statistically should v the proven better players it's that simple. This helps prevent them from going bust too fast and keeping games up and running. But like I said in the end it doesn't usually matter cuz they usually end up losing their stack anyways it just takes longer than it normally would have. Site implements a handicapping system. Which would easily be pointed out and they know this if they ever allowed hand history collection which is why David will never allow it he can prove me wrong right now and say they'll allow it he won't
Global Poker RNG discussion thread. I'm sure you've been there. Prior poster with similar stubbornness and manner of speaking anyway....
Search for HUD and scroll through the post it finds. Someone stayed around answering questions.
I played on Global since they started almost. I have not played on a site that someone has not decided it was rigged in some fashion. Naturally, like you they never post any evidence. IF someone was winning and they figured out a rig, well...let's just say they'd be pretty silly to complain about it or share it with anyone else.
While riggies chase the boogeyman of rigdom sans evidence, they have no knowledge or concern over actual real issues such as collusion and betting. Feel free to see the thread I made outing a boring and helping to recover 7 figures in player funds.
I'm happy to admit I do not have the expertise to studying HH for aberrations but I can point to a handful of extremely smart people that do just that. Doubters were comfortable with the banned player's reporting of different hand scenarios. They did not say a single riggie nor will logic or math ever do that.
As someone that has private clubs and games, of you want to rig it then the way the house makes the most money is by pots hitting the rake cap and not going over it. Action rig, weak player rig, preselected winner rig, etc... all have the same thing in common as the Easter bunny or claim to be one of the winningest players on X site. The common theme is it's all fantasy and doesn't exist.