The bolded is demonstrably false. Sites that provide hand histories have as many riggies as ones that don't.

Please name someone who was banned because they questioned the legitimacy of a poker room.

Does Itech labs actively monitor the daily operations? Or do they certify a RNG one time and have no idea if it is the one actually being used or has been altered?

Real question. If you do not know the answer I don't care about your opinion.

If you have any brains (which is up for grabs at this point), then NEVER PLAY ONLINE POKER EVER AGAIN! YOU WILL LOSE! AND YOU WILL LOSE BIG!!!

Are you still being stupid, or have you learned your lesson?

I actually won a major tournament today. All started with the free daily coins! Looks like things are back to normal. Thanks!

Read it. They digitally fingerprinted the code. Itech labs can tell if they changed it. I don't know how they monitor it though.

Congratulations!

If you have any brains (which is up for grabs at this point), then please CASH OUT AT ONCE!!! OTHERWISE, YOU WILL LOSE IT ALL!!!

Deposited $50 couple years ago. Withdrew 3400, current balance is just under 500. Play not very often on the site, but pretty soft overall. Someone that had an illegal HUD once posted stats that runs the riggie brain. Turns out, there was no aberration of stand deviation and over a fairly large sample size.

Riggies will always riggie. It justifies their poor poker play and gives them good feelz. They're rarely concerned with real issues like collusion, RTA assistance, or real bots. The reality is, the boogeyman is your skill of lack thereof.

I'd not believe you.

One doesn't have to disclose their player name to show proof or high likelihood of something being off. The math has proven the site is real. The player posted all kinds of data that people requested. He admitted to using a HUD, had a large HH database, was banned, and gave raw data to any questions people asked. Nothing anyone can say, regardless of how much they tout their credentials, will surpass the actual math as evidence.

Are you guessing here, or do you have actual evidence for your claims?

I agree with you; when Global does something they do it for a reason.

Maybe. Maybe not. Who knows?

The Global model caters to recs, so it makes sense that skilled players could do better on Global than on many other sites. Absence of rakeback and the banning of HUDS and the absence HH keeps many good regs away.

Why should we trust you, brother?

To be clear, I don't think you should necessarily trust me. Especially given that I'm paid $24.99+S&H per shill post.

Reposted for BoboFett.

articfox is that you?

Hey artic, I genuinely can't tell if you're suffering from a mental illness or not at this point, and this is some sort of coping mechanism, but maybe before going full site is a scam conspiracy mode again, you could pay back the guy that you actually scammed?

Because your stupid opinion can prevent other players from joining the site if others don’t show just how wrong you are (which has been done quite effectively in this thread).

I can tell you that’s definitely not the case. Wasn’t with the old owners, won’t be with the new.

GP are giving 5bb per 100 raked hands via the Amplifier. How much do you think that’s worth to a reg in RB%?

I don’t understand what you mean…?

Nothing. You could argue the rake level effectively limits winrates, or capping promotions affects the reward rate per hand too, but nothing specific like that is really needed.

Yeah that’s pretty much the go to for most poker sites. Liquidity is more important than rakeback for smart regs.

The availability of HH (or lack thereof) does not deter riggie accusations. All the sites that do provide HH have a cadre of riggies. That's because riggies don't actually analyze data. They typically don't want to, and even when they do want to, either they don't know how or can't be bothered with the effort required to do a good job of it.

Look at the "Is Poker Rigged" thread in the other forum. Plenty of riggies there. Many of them probably couldn't figure out how to set up a HUD if their life depended on it.

He's the guy that got banned on 6/5/21 the day before you "created" your account on 6/6/21. Kind of babbling about rigged nonsense with poor grammar and hostility towards global management.

Doesn't matter. As I said, someone used an illegal HUD and had a large HH. Zero aberrations. I know, you're smarter and will find something no one else did. Then you'll still say something is wrong.

You've made claims of posts being removed and even said you expect this one or that to be removed and those are still here. Your view of your "credentials" take a big hit when your boasts have zero to back it up and your claims of specific posts will be deleted and still there. You are just a standard riggie. Plenty of super smart riggies with posts in the appropriate riggie thread saying that, they too, have superior credentials and have no need to prove anything. All us little people relying on math and actual evidence just aren't smart enough to understand.

If you had a large HH and found nothing off you would still believe that your feelz are what matters.