Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
Like I said just literally close ur eyes and IMAGINE if lagtight is a real person how big of a clown this guy must be lol. He literally makes 99% of his post about how FAIR global poker is while he plays 3 hands at micro stakes. He's literally agrueing with prolly the most accomplished player he every had the privilege to speak with an one of the biggest winners on global ever telling him the deck helps these fish and bad regs so much it's literally blantent just imagine this guy
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett
The fish are extra extra fishy and the regs are bums. Theirs literally only 4 regs that are actually good on there in a classical sense. That leaves ALOT of regs and bad fish who will never ever ever win unless they get smashed with the deck over and over. Literally the screen names you watch and think are good on their i laugh at their moves and overall game. These fish or bad regs will never beat anyone good in an equal setup. Whether it's just luck or global manipulating the deck for em to get their piece these ppl would lose 95/100 if situations were really 1 to 1 v anyone good
When you say "...most accomplished player..." do you mean you? Because even on the slim chance you are an absolute crusher, you sound like an absolute clown saying stuff like this.
You understand if most the players on the site are bum regs or extra extra fishy fish, that with a fair deck some of these terrible players who wouldn't win in tougher games, will in fact be winners.....because someone has to win, that's how poker works.
When you say things like these people would lose 95/100 situations, you scream "I don't know anything about poker." Do you know how often shoving ATC into AA wins? Almost 15% of the time. You know how often shoving 72o beats AA? Almost 12% of the time. It's interesting because bad players, who are in part bad because they don't understand the probabilities and the variance over sample sizes, are the only reason the game can continue to exist.
I'm not saying Global is 100% fair. I couldn't possibly know that. But from my experience over a decent but still small sample size across 3 years it seems pretty standard to me, and your entirely unsubstantiated claims of "I'm a crusher you should all be grateful to listen to," "Global is clearly fixed, if you just open your eyes you would see a bad player win several times with bad play in a single session," and "all the other players are terrible," are just that. Unsubstantiated nonsense.