Gift and Curse. I saw you removed your post stating the hand (where I supposedly got stacked with QJ) did happen and you remember for sure that it happened. Why would I lie about this? It didn’t happen. I was not stacked with Q-J at the table with the person in question or any other person. You won’t find such a hand from your history or GP itself. It is not like I am requesting a resolution. I merely made a statement, and it is finished. The player knows my folded hand. People explain it as being from a glitch. I will avoid the player as a precaution. Resolved.

There is definitely more to life than posting on a forum. For instance, if you plan to accuse someone else of cheating, and you name them on the internet, you should have proper proof to back your claim. You had none. Zero. Even after it was pointed out that your claim lacked common sense, you still stuck by it. Even after it was explained that it was some glitch that happens with their replayer, and a forum mod changed your post to remove the user name you posted, you took pride in having posted about it in a lot of forums. You are still sticking by it by avoiding the other player due to "concern."

You have zero common sense, and you compound that with an inability to admit when you rushed to a poor judgment. You are a weak human being, and ideally your DNA will not be passed on to future generations for the sake of the species.

All the best.

"I understand Global Poker would like to tread on the side of caution in cases of gameplay violations. However, blocking accounts on a single accusation, without conducting due diligence, is bad practice and it leaves the honest player being accused in a terrible situation. Being accused of cheating when you didn't is truly a horrible thing, and I hope no player goes through it." - MinionMath21

ironic

http://pokerrobot.review/poker/29095...9-global-poker

I didn’t suggest his account should get blocked. I suggested he should get investigated and his funds frozen. There is a big difference there. I was kicked out my account for much less than what is on this thread for “game play violation”. That is pretty ironic. And Gift and Curse, you ate your words and deleted your post regarding a hand that you claimed happened. You are just clueless. Thanks for your input.

Great Video Monteroy ; Never saw that guy before . The System was great . Had it figured until the end . Not sure if he just took a stab on the final race but great watch .

Good Homework : LOLZZZZZZ

For someone who's so quick to reply to so many posts, you sure didn't have much to say about this:

Minion, you came here for support and got it. The HH glitch is a very plausible explanation. Would love it if someone could screenshot the HH glitch so it's posted for assurance purposes to players that go through this experience.

The good that's come from this post for me is that i'm now aware of the HH glitch.

As much as i appreciate you posting your experience this is a great learning situation on what type of posts are acceptable when making an accusation. These guys are right. Until something is proven as fact the players name should be left out. I hope you end up agreeing on this issue.

I do believe the title of this thread should be renamed to be based on the 'glitch'.

Best of luck at the tables

Of course, it wouldn’t make sense. Nobody would do that on purpose. But if they made a mistake and called out a hand that they thought was in play, they would do exactly what the player did when confronted - leave all tables they were at immediately. This is why my suspicions had risen. Granted, the glitch people are mentioning is plausible, and I am happy to hear there is some potential explanation. It won’t stop me from avoiding the player as a second layer of security, but that’s just me. Thank you for your response Mother’s milk. One of the few none douche responses. I appreciate it.

Yes, there is a difference. What about the bolded part, though?

Perhaps something you should have kept in mind before publicly accusing someone of cheating, on the world's biggest poker forum, given that you're not even remotely close to certain that's what happened here.

I stand behind my accusation. I acknowledged a lucky guess was highly unlikely but possible. I thus left room for the player’s innocence.

The player mentioned is DEF not a superuser (no offense meant to the player). Played many hands and after felting him/her a few times he/she called me a lucky fish and insta left a buncha tables we we both on.

If you think someone saying something then bouncing should result in "frozen funds pending investigation" then you have issues far beyond this forum being able to explain how that is messed up...

I am a statistician. Without the glitch possibility (which I was unaware of), this player had to have cheated. With the information that was available to me, I made the best decision. Like I said, I stand behind my decision as I didn’t definitively state the player was guilty, but simply an investigation should be conducted.

Anyway, I am done with the thread. Good luck to everyone. And I don’t know who you are Anxiety Attack but we could play any time any table. Later

Oh, this is awesome. Claiming you're a statistician, and then in the very next sentence, making another claim that it would take a pretty poor statistician to make. LOL.

Bobo, you do what you do- run forums. Let professionals do what they do.

I, um, wait, what???

Further to my last post, it seems you should have taken some courses in common sense instead, but I don't think that's taught in universities. If you think it makes sense that someone would have super using capabilities, but be spending his time berating you for your play in one hand, I don't know what to tell you. Yeah, if I had super using capabilities, I'd be drawing attention to myself by berating opponents. Because, you know, while I'd use my super using access to see people's hands to find opportunities to mock them, I'd be extra careful to only do so with hands that I thought were in play so no one would suspect anything. It would be so much fun, I probably wouldn't even try winning any money - I'd just spend my day mocking people.

The fact that you think this possibility is far more likely than any other...boggles the mind.

OK, one more post on this.

I went back and reread your OP. And I have to admit, if the same thing happened to me, I'd be wondering WTF had happened. I fold, someone LOLs at me for folding my hand, which he names. I take no issue with you wondering what's going on. Where you went wrong and why you're getting such a hard time, IMO, is the approach you took afterwards.

There are a number of possibilities I can think of:

1) ******* who likes to jab at people, even throwing out random guesses at cards hoping to aggravate them when he gets it right. Why not? No harm to him if he gets it wrong.
2) He's referring to some past hand (whether he's correct or not).
3) Glitch.
4) You are a victim of a hack.
5) Super user.

What you did is jump immediately to 5, in spite of it being easily the least likely. And yes, you jumped there. Sure, you left the possibility of it being a guess in your post, but you said it was astronomically unlikely, and want his account frozen while they investigate. That, and your posts since, show a definite presumption of guilt on your part. And I say least likely for two reasons. A super user would be a really, really, big deal. People seem to like to throw that term around a lot, but aside from LOLCereus where they built the capability into the software, there's never been anything close to a proven case of another one. Doesn't mean it couldn't happen, of course, but it requires some complicity on the site's side, or hacking of an unheard of level (on poker sites, anyway). And the other reason is the unlikeliness of someone who had that capability using it for this purpose.

All that said, 3-5 are all concerning possibilities. Seems like it would be prudent to let the site know and ask them to investigate. Even starting a thread to let people know and get their input seems reasonable. But putting the guy's name out there as someone you think is almost certainly a super user is a bridge too far. It's not fair to that person, and as you can see from the replies you've had, it doesn't get you very good results.

This thread has gone far enough off track.

OP asked a question, got it, let's all move on.

Closed