Quote:
Originally Posted by balvey
I didn't say that they "vouch" for Global. I just know that for instance, if they suspect someone is using their SES service to spam individuals, they'll lock it down. If they detect any sort of Ddos attack, they'll block IP addresses. I was just stating they are very diligent in those regards. I would think that matters of "homeland security" ( illegal internet gaming act was passed as a homeland security law i think ) would be taken seriously, but who know's. I guess I could see it being similar to not being able to hold an ISP responsible for illegal activity a customer performs using their service.
As far as S3 goes, that's just their block storage solution. The only type of websites you can host directly from S3 are static sites. Global is using ec2 instances behind public load balancers, they might be using S3 for log files or other various file storage.
I see what you are saying, but I would also say all of those "bad" behaviors have a direct impact on Amazon servers, so therefor they care a great deal more when a server is being used for spam. If their IPs end up on blacklists, that is bad for business.
I think, although cannot prove, it is much more likely that Amazon sees it the way your ISP does as you state. We will take action when someone tells us too.
Agreed with you completely on how Global uses Amazon services, I am using the phrasing of S3 in a sloppy way to refer to any services Global might use at Amazon. Not meant for an actual understanding of how they are designed, just more laziness than anything
Sorry about any confusion from my end on that point.