Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Dont talk about it be about it, ITS TIME Dont talk about it be about it, ITS TIME

12-17-2017 , 01:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by big bwalz
Bobo please delete this also or move to the christmas promo thread where it belongs. further trolling from the lantern should result in a short term ban.
Jeez man no need to get the cops involved. Don't get all hostile with me because you wasted your time on some patchwork dissertation on how much you hate Grobul.
12-17-2017 , 01:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern
Jeez man no need to get the cops involved. Don't get all hostile with me because you wasted your time on some patchwork dissertation on how much you hate Grobul.
again mods please delete this new accounts trolling comments and give him a warning or a temp ban
12-17-2017 , 01:36 AM
some people play to make $, sure they enjoy it, probably very much like GPCSadmin, likes his/her job but if enough people dont enjoy playing on the site said rep loses job. Bodognate, all the past pokerstars reps, the ITOPS rep etc are examples.. Some sites decide they dont want to get big, ITOPS is a perfect example, they could have blown up but they made the internal decision to keep the poker side of the business small because they kill it with the sb and casino with the us and euro mkt. Its a weird business, they could not even have poker but they do and make sure to keep it small. There are a few reasons why, 1 stop the poker pros from winning and caching out potential casino proceeds, 2 stay under US govt radar.

in fact gp may even decide not to even pay for this forum any longer. That's happened in the past too, in sponsored threads and forums
12-17-2017 , 01:41 AM
Merge did the same thing, they could have been huge, in fact many people feel their software was on par with full tilt and poker stars and im one of them it was top 3. they also ruined their games and everyone left, now they ban winning players and make good $ from casino and sportsbook, thats fine. They also dont try to sell it as "make poker great again".
12-17-2017 , 05:12 AM
Ungrateful grinches made me LOL

But yeah nothing is going to happen.

It is what it is / It will be what it will be.

#My2Cents
12-17-2017 , 05:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by big bwalz
Cliffs on my experiences and what I’ve seen happen at GP since I started playing sng’s and occasional mtt’s there 6/17.

MTTS –

Early on the structures were very fast, I don’t recall or have screenshots but I think they were close to the turbo/regular speed sng structures now. People posted about it and the site added levels around July I believe.

Around August/September the mtt payout structure was changed. It was increased to pay around 20% of the field. In the 1r/1a games a min cash pays ~2.3 buyins, so if a player does the add on and rebuy, and mincashes they still lose ~2/3 of a buyin. A reg from the mtt sweat thread posted about it somewhere, then said it changed back but the lobby I’m looking at now for the wknd $500 gtd 1r/1a 6max $3.30 has the figures I posted above, mincash pays $6.90.

The payouts are better in freezeout events and ones with smaller field sizes. The MTT’s IMO are pretty good now overall and relative to other US facing sites, GP lowered the variance by the slowing down of the structure and then slightly increased it by the payout changes.

STTS -

In May, end of June, the sngs were amazing, until 10/13 when GP made the following changes.
- Changed the blind structures, removing some levels making much faster game
- Reducing the time of levels in non turbo games from 10 to 8 mins
- Increasing starting stacks from 1k to 1500
- Removed $3 regular speed 9man games entirely
- Adding hyper turbos raked @ 7%

The current blind structures are close to what I think the MTT structures used to be, and the current MTT structures are what the SNG’s other than hypers were before the changes. Below I will post GP’s game offerings, along with WPN for comparison. I can’t log onto Bovada so maybe somebody else will add that info. I looked at BOL and was going to add it, lobbies seem somewhat all over the place, rake between 9-11% for all formats, 6man payouts ~65/35 but a little off one way or the other in most games it looks like, too much of a mess to compile anything. There was good traffic though fwiw while I was browsing the lobby for the purpose of this post. Merge has to little traffic IMO to be a part of the discussion not to mention they’ve banned winning players among other things.

IMO on GP currently, the hypers actually have more room for play due the smaller blind increases, in spite of the shorter level durations. They are a better game to play for highest hourly rate because of the deceptively high variance nature of the turbo and regular speed games and how much longer the latter 2 take to play, imo. What I would really like to see happen is maybe reduce the rake in hypers to 4-5%, bring back the old blind structures in the other games but keep the shorter time levels as a compromise? Or keep the same structures and drop the turbo rake to 6%, regular games to 8% too since they play so fast. Bring back/add some 9 man non turbo regular speed games at the smaller/medium bi levels. The sng buy in levels have the same problem cash games here used to before 3-6 & 5-10 were added, too large of gaps.

Hypers
Global
500 starting stack,
7% rake
3 min levels
Payouts – 9mans 1st 50%, 2nd 30% , 3rd 20%. 6mans 1st 65% 2nd 35%
10/20, 25/50, 40/80, 60/120, 80/160, 100/200, 125/250, 150/300…

WPN
500 starting stack
4.5-6.5% rake depending on buy in level and # of opponents.
2 min levels
Payouts – 9mans 1st 50%, 2nd 30% , 3rd 20%. 6mans 1st 65% 2nd 35%
10/20, 15/30, 20/40, 25/50 5, 30/60 6, 40/80 8, 50/100 10, 6 0/120 12, 75/150 15,…

Turbo and Regular speed STTS

Global
1500 starting stacks,
5 mins for turbos, 8 min levels for regular speed games
10% rake for both turbos and non turbos
15/30, 30/60, 60/120, 100-200, 150-300, 200-400, 300-600, 450-900..
Payouts – 9mans 1st 50%, 2nd 30% , 3rd 20%. 6mans 1st 65% 2nd 35%

WPN
1500 starting stack,
5 mins for turbos, 10 mins for regular speed games
9% for turbos, 10% rake for regular speed games
10/20, 15/30, 25/50, 50/100, 75/150, 100/200, 100/200 25, 150/300 25, 200/400 25….
Payouts – 9mans 1st 50%, 2nd 30% , 3rd 20%. 6mans 1st 65% 2nd 35%


General info about BOL
Starting stack 1500 regular and turbos, 500 hypers
Rake – between 9-11% for 6-9 man regular speed, turbo and hypers
Level times – hypers 2 mins, turbos 5 mins, regulars 8 min
Blinds for all speeds – 10/20, 15/30, 25/50, 50/100, 75/150, 100/200, 150/300, 200/400, 300/600, 400/800

There are many different ways to analyze those game #’s. A couple easy ones are as follows.
- Time into game where bb is 10% starting stack

Regular speed games
GP – bb = 8% of starting stack @ 17 mins
WPN bb= 10% @ 41 mins

Turbos

GP - bb = 8% of starting stack @ 11 mins
WPN - bb= 10% @ 21 mins
Hypers

GP – bb = 10% starting stack @ 6mins
WPN – bb = 10% starting stack @7 mins

- Time into game/ % of chips in play preflop as blinds.

Regular speed games
GP = 4.4% @ 41 mins
WPN = 1.6% @ 41 mins

Turbos

GP - 4.4% @ 26 mins
WPN – 1.6% @21 mins

Hypers
GP – 6% @ 10 mins (60/120)
10% (100/200)@ 16 mins

WPN – 4% (not incl 10% antes)@ 11 mins (30/60 6)
6% @15 mins(60/120 12)

Some closing thoughts..
WPN and Bovada have a casino and a sportsbook to constantly feed its player pool, people(recreational players) who play other games in the same client that stop by the poker room to recreate. Same with Merge, , BOL, ITOPS and all the other USA facing unreglated sites which GP is, other than GP. GP only has a facebook playerpool, some poker media advertising like this forum and articles on paid for new sites and word of mouth. Once the player pool isn’t winning as much or as often and wonder why and/or if they can/should expect to on GP or anywhere else and starts looking around..

WPN has a flat 27% rakeback program or a rewards program that’s almost exactly the same as pokerstars old supernova elite system, players can choose on sign up iirc and are allowed a 1 time change if they decide to switch, and theres multiple skins for the network. HUDs are allowed there, and they are used on bovada and BOL, there are cardcatchers and hand converters that can be used to scrape the data and import it into existing hud software in real time for live in game use.

The removal of the hand replayer and hh’s from dealer chat and increasingly fewer posts from the mods, the changes to the games detailed above I will be spending my time and $ elsewhere until or if any changes are made to make GP more appealing to me. More and more players are hearing of this site, games are getting harder I feel some recent poker related changes are very player unfriendly. I’m all for the promos, facebook stuff but as OP said, GP has a monopoly on the US “legal” market and is taking advantage I feel and damaging the site, industry, playerbase, poker economy as a whole etc.

Idk if a sitout is the right thing to do, maybe more of a petition? I made my thread about my cashout of roll because posters such as Splaya have said to speak with your $ instead of forum posts, and that if the site isn’t appealing to a player then not to play there. So when it became too unpleasant for me that’s what I did, withdrew and told the site and community why.
GP does have awesome cashier functionality. The recent game changes are not and cannot be offset by a soft player pool (which is getting less soft) and fast easy cashier transactions. Cashier and bad players are useless to me if games are too high variance structure for much long term profit expectations combined with zero rewards program.

I feel the poker industry as a whole, not just GP have been trying to convert poker into a casino style game for years now and they have made the game a lot less profitable and enjoyable for many. I always thought people player poker to compete, and have an expectation of winning if some skill was developed or applied to poker games as opposed to just being happy to play and not caring about or having a positive expected $ outcome. Sports betting and other forms of gambling are better avenues for that, easier, more fun, far larger potential winnings etc. I’m concerned that once the fb/znyga player pool dries up and the true “poker” offerings keep diminishing the game as a whole will kinda just die off. It’s a great game, a historical game; I feel as players we should protect it and ourselves.

End of novel.
This is by far the best and most informative post I have read from you and possibly on the discussion overall. Facts without rants are needed to institute any kind of change. Merely stating the rake is the highest or the blind structure needs work is much different than showing side by side comparison.

I don't see them ever moving towards the standard online network, aka rake programs and acceptance of software. Their market is the people that would have no real interest in those aspects. One of the big reasons people play here is because there is so much loose and poor play. A positive ROI is not a difficult task by any stretch. They do give back to the community in other ways, which is based on amount of activity. I think it falls below what people are used to seeing. Again, I think their model is to specifically not be the same as the others.

Not being able to access hand histories seems to be a fairly inane option. We should be able to look back at our hands whenever we choose. Make it anonymous if necessary, but I would like to be able to see where I misread or blew myself up in a hand. I cannot fathom the reasoning behind not having synchronized breaks in their MTT schedule. There are a lot of little things that should be worked corrected.

They do seem to be pretty quick to censor wording based on various degrees of hurt. Other sub-forums will do it too, I think it is pretty much all wrong, slander and threats aside. With that said, locking the rake thread pretty much means it is a dead issue in my eyes. I also can see their side of it when a thread title pops up in a SEO at the top suggesting a scam.

Sit-out isn't likely to do very much. If even half of the better players decide they are going to do it, that just leaves a much higher percentage of dead money on the tables. I'm not against trying to capitalize on that vacuum. On the other hand, posts like the one I'm responding to would likely have a far greater effect. The reps aren't very active here; but, I would think they probably lurk on a daily basis. Informed, logical discussion with facts and comparisons is probably the best way to effect desired change. It isn't likely to bring about 100% satisfaction, but the odds of some sort of compromise is high.

Another thing to consider, they would probably look to expand into more countries. That would bring in new waves of fish, too. It would be nice for them to respond, in a detailed manner, saying why/why not some things are done and what the future plan is.
12-17-2017 , 06:03 AM
Global doesn't owe anyone jack **** regarding why/why not they do things and revealing what their future plan is.

This is a business.

We are consumers.
12-17-2017 , 06:08 AM
Which is pretty much the reason I said it would be nice if they did.
12-17-2017 , 11:41 AM
updated #'s to include Bovada

Hypers

Global
500 starting stack,
7% rake
3 min levels
Payouts – 9mans 1st 50%, 2nd 30% , 3rd 20%. 6mans 1st 65% 2nd 35%
10/20, 25/50, 40/80, 60/120, 80/160, 100/200, 125/250, 150/300…

WPN
500 starting stack
4.5-6.5% rake depending on buy in level and # of opponents.
2 min levels
Payouts – 9mans 1st 50%, 2nd 30% , 3rd 20%. 6mans 1st 65% 2nd 35%
10/20, 15/30, 20/40, 25/50 5, 30/60 6, 40/80 8, 50/100 10, 6 0/120 12, 75/150 15,…

Bovada
500 starting stack
5% rake
3 min levels
6 man 1st 65% 2nd 35%
10/20, 15/30, 25/50, 50/100, 75/150, 100/200, 150/300, 200/400, 300/600

Turbo and Regular speed STTS

Global

1500 starting stacks,
5 mins for turbos, 8 min levels for regular speed games
10% rake for both turbos and non turbos
15/30, 30/60, 60/120, 100-200, 150-300, 200-400, 300-600, 450-900..
Payouts – 9mans 1st 50%, 2nd 30% , 3rd 20%. 6mans 1st 65% 2nd 35%

WPN
1500 starting stack
5 mins for turbos, 10 mins for regular speed games
9% for turbos, 10% rake for regular speed games
10/20, 15/30, 25/50, 50/100, 75/150, 100/200, 100/200 25, 150/300 25, 200/400 25….
Payouts – 9mans 1st 50%, 2nd 30% , 3rd 20%. 6mans 1st 65% 2nd 35%

Bovada
1500 starting stack,
5 mins for turbos, 10 mins for regular speed games
10% rake for both turbo and non turbos
10/20, 15/30, 25/50, 50/100, 75/150, 100/200, 150/300, 200/400, 300/600
Payouts – 9mans 1st 50%, 2nd 30% , 3rd 20%. 6mans 1st 65% 2nd 35%

There are many different ways to analyze those game #’s. A couple easy ones are as follows.
- Time into game where bb is 10% starting stack

Regular speed games
GP – bb = 8% of starting stack @ 17 mins
WPN – bb = 10% @ 41 mins
BV – bb = 10% @ 41 mins

Turbos
GP - bb = 8% of starting stack @ 11 mins
WPN - bb= 10% @ 21 mins
BV – bb = 10% @ 21 mins

Hypers
GP – bb = 10% starting stack @ 6mins
WPN – bb = 10% starting stack @7 mins
BV – bb = 10% starting stack @ 7 mins

- Time into game/ % of chips in play preflop as blinds.


Regular speed games
GP = 4.4% @ 41 mins
WPN = 1.6% @ 41 mins
BV = 1.6% @ 41 mins

Turbos
GP - 4.4% @ 26 mins
WPN – 1.6% @ 21 mins
BV – 1.6% @ 21 mins

Hypers
GP – 6% @ 10 mins (60/120)
10% (100/200)@ 16 mins

WPN – 4% (not incl 10% antes)@ 11 mins (30/60 6)
6% @15 mins (60/120 12)

BV – 5% @ 10 mins (50/100)
10% (100/200) @ 16 mins

Last edited by big bwalz; 12-17-2017 at 11:58 AM.
12-17-2017 , 01:00 PM
I say we increase the rake. Who's with me?
12-17-2017 , 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-inMcLovin
Global doesn't owe anyone jack **** regarding why/why not they do things and revealing what their future plan is.

This is a business.

We are consumers.
the playerbase doesn't owe global anything either.

the people in this thread are dissenters

globalpoker are a business.

They are free to put the work in for lower rake if they are organized,
what's the problem?
12-17-2017 , 06:21 PM
+1 to big bwalz in this thread. It is pretty well known he and I don't see eye to eye on a lot of topics. But this thread is excellent, and exactly what Global will need to see if changes are to happen. Using the data along with a combination of explanation why the data trends are good or bad for the player base and for Global is the kind of reasoning that could convenience Global to make changes. Sure, they don't have to change anything, but if they were lead to change something, facts like these are the ammo we need.

Well done big bwalz, a tip of my hat to you.
12-17-2017 , 06:31 PM
Yeah, good stuff.
12-17-2017 , 11:40 PM
@ adewd - thanks I appreciate your comment, and I agree they can do whatever they want, and it depends on a lot of different things, very complicated. Hopefully if more people feel the way I and others do and we are able to organize and present in a professional manner some sort of comprimise can be reached as you said.

@ Stroggz - thanks and I agree, well said!

@ splayaa - Thank you sir, much appreciated comment, means a lot. I'm not a bad guy lol although I don't always present myself or my thoughts in the best light. I just want a good site for everyone long story short, players, operators, shareholders etc everyone all around.

@ SitandSpin - thanks man!

Hopefully somebody can do something similar to what I did for the cash game side and post it, current rake relative to other US facing sites, the changes and additions GP has made and a timeline. Hopefully we as a community can come together and organize and present things well to get some improvements to the cash game rake, offerings and same with the stts. Thanks again everyone!
12-20-2017 , 09:51 AM
For anyone curious I posted a cash rake breakdown in the rake thread 2. Very high level, but clearly shows how behind global is in their rake especially short handed. Just makes me laugh when their rep stated they are competitive with other sites rake. They are free to charge as they see fit, but the reps should not be blatantly saying false things about their rake especially when at that time it was not posted on their website. Only part that really hears me up.
12-20-2017 , 11:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rutledge Smitty
For anyone curious I posted a cash rake breakdown in the rake thread 2. Very high level, but clearly shows how behind global is in their rake especially short handed. Just makes me laugh when their rep stated they are competitive with other sites rake. They are free to charge as they see fit, but the reps should not be blatantly saying false things about their rake especially when at that time it was not posted on their website. Only part that really hears me up.
thank you for doing that and I've got one q.. When you said "very high level" I didn't see it that way, and then it occurred to me that the same may apply to my math? What did you mean by high level, I thought you did a great job and it was very straightforward. i also felt the same about my contribution but I might be wrong obv. Maybe the forums are dead because of the time of year but I'm really surprised this has just sat around, to you and I it's kind of a big deal...?
12-21-2017 , 10:04 AM
I meant that as in I didn't account for rakeback (specifically with ACR) and I only included 2 other sites for comparison. It wasn't that high level I guess looking back. I guess people have kind of conceded that the site is going to do what it wants regarding rake which is true. Still would like to keep the rake thread at least going here as we cannot trust the site to be 100% transparent with any future changes as seen last time they upped the rake.

      
m