So if someone accuses you of rape you would not get defensive? People react differently to accusations, such a dumb comment.

whatever happened to that xxxxxx89 player that was accused of "BOTulism"?

He still playin?

He plays micro SnGs, variance in these games is basically break even.

Hey guys,

Just a quick comment about this broadly. I can't and won't speak about this specific isssue.

Players accounts are never banned just because somebody accuses them of being a bot.

As well as proactively scanning for automated play we investigate every single allegation made. The vast majority of these are thrown out as frivolous.

We use a number of techniques as part of these investigations. I won't go into detail for obvious reasons but they are consistent with the methods used by other leading poker sites in this space.

The video is not made public, it is for our records solely and once human play is proven the matter is closed and the account status is returned to normal.

Thanks

So the fact that his account was initially banned tells us that they found evidence of bot/software play.

Cool.

Nope, your investigation team made a mistake, You may not say it, but he very likely was suspended because of complaints, I really doubt it was for any other reason, this guy has received more complaints of being a bot then anyone else on this site. With that said, im happy you guys are doing this instead of not checking, this is good you guys care enough to do this, im not beating you guys down, trust me, I like what you guys are doing here, and like I said this is just IMO and there could be other reasons you guys suspended/banned his account, only you guys know and I dont, I just saw a ton of complaints about this specific player and it did not suprise me to see this happen.

no that is not what is said. sounds like he or she needs to make a video for gp.
that shows they can handle the volume. sounds legit to me. though i believe human is a real player.

"Players accounts are never banned just because somebody accuses them of being a bot."

His account was banned. Only re-opened to make a video.

LOL Joey clearly needs to have GP hire this guy. He apparently knows everything for certain.

One thing for certain is that someone has 6 days to learn to play poker very fast.

Except this is not rape you idiot.

Lol. Such a dumb comment.

The majority of you sound like whiny bad regs dude plays just like any other tight reg. If hes on does it not mean he proved to global hes human or am I confused? I think Poker12 was prolly right estimating the hours human played.

You're confused.

His account was banned.

They told him he would be unbanned for 7 days to create a video for them. If he didn't then he's back to being banned. He's also still restricted from making any cashouts.

If you go back a few pages OP posted the email from GP.

Cool story. Give me the ability to withdraw again.

Here's a little math lesson for the majority of you who fail the elementary level.

If you play for 3hrs, take a 2hr break, play for 3 hrs, take a 2hr break, then play for 3 hrs again you've played a total of 9 hrs, not 13.

I know I know. Learn something new everyday right?

Its not a dumb comment, the average ROI for good players in these micro SnGs is around 15 to 20%, maybe not for you, but for alot of the good players it is, anytime you run bad in these games you mostly just end up breaking even because of the such high ROIs, for example a player grinding higher stakes that has a 4% ROI is more likely to experince a downswing because of the lesser ege and lower ROI.

It does not matter what the issue is, people react differently to accusations, just because he reacted the way he did does not constitute guilt.

****, the $6/$11 9mans on GP are such a fishbowl I'd say ROI's even higher than 20% are attainable.

I think so. I played them for cpl hours not too long ago. Folded the first two levels or so and was done to 4 or 5 handed. Really bad play from some of them. Several players were in most games with me doing the exact same thing. More like clicking buttons vs playing poker.

Exactly, this is my point, if you take 2 players that have the exact same skill and put one in $100 SnGs, and you have another play $6 SnGs, if they both play a couple thousand games, who is more likely to experience downswings? Obviously its the guy playing the higher stakes, his ROI is going to be lower and will be more likely to have dips in his graph, vs the guy with 20% ROI in $6 games.

I wasn't discrediting your point?

My roi is higher than that.

Ok reasonable. I still think he's guilty.

This is funny. Imagine freaking out on 2 plus 2 and then the site saying, okay, do your thing. Earlier when I looked, he finished 5-9 in every sng but it was a very small sample size. I am going to grind these sng the next 6 days looking for him for ****s. will report what I see if anything worth seeing

Ha yeah. And then like you pointed out in a past post he is playing much lower volume. Hope he realizes that when gp wants a video of a "normal" session they obviously want a pre-ban "normal session" not slow session.

This includes this:

Rut Row..