Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Test Your Poker Math Ability Test Your Poker Math Ability

12-30-2018 , 02:03 PM
How good is your poker math knowledge? Here is a 20 question test that addresses this. Write your answers down and then compare to the correct answers provided in the hidden panel. A link to a site that might help to increase your Hold ‘em math ability is provided at the end.

1. EV stands for A) Expected Variance B) Equity Variation C) Expected Value D) Earned Value

2. Running It Twice A) Increases Profit B) Decreases Profit C) Increases Variance D) Decreases Variance E) None of these

3. ITM can be either positive, zero or negative A) True B) False

4. Playing GTO heads up in a rake free game means you will not lose in the long run A) True B) False

5. The pot is $100 after opponent has bet $40. If you have a 60% chance to win the pot of $100 if you call the $40 bet, your profit/loss will average to A) $60 B) $20 C) $36 D) $44

6. ICM theory relies solely on stack sizes and the assumption all players are of equal capability A) True B) False

7. Implied Odds are most useful in deciding whether to shove or not A) True B) False

8. How many combos of AA are there in dealing a Hold ‘em hand A) 3 B) 4 C) 5 D) 6 E) None of these

9. The approximate chance you will be dealt suited cards in Hold ‘em is A) 5% B) 15% C) 25% D) 35%

10. In general, the variance in tournaments is greater than that of cash games A) True B) False

11. How is win rate usually measured for on-line cash-game play A) bb/100 hands B) $/hour C) Either D) Neither

12. The Equity Realization concept is related to A) The likelihood you will not fold B) The likelihood you will win as often as calculated by an equity calculator C) The chance villain will fold D) None of these E) All of these

13. A common definition of fold equity is A) The chance villain will fold to your bet/raise B) The chance you will fold to villain’s action C) The chance the hand will end through a fold D) None of these

14. Loss probability can be greater than 100% if an opponent has the absolute nuts A) True B) False

15. Making an opponent indifferent means you bet in such a way that he doesn’t take you seriously A) True B) False

16. You bet $20 all-in into a $40 pot. How much equity does villain need to have to justify calling? A) 25% B) 33% C) 50% D) 67%

17. In question 16, if villain wanted to employ a minimum defense frequency (MDF), how often should he call? A) 25% B) 33% C) 50% D) 67%

18. You have Ac Ad with a turn board of 2c 2h Qc 7c . You are pretty sure villain has two clubs. How many outs do you have for a river win?

19. The 2x-4x rule applies only for pre-flop and flop bets? A) True B) False

20. If your showdown equity is 20%, the odds against your winning in a showdown are A) 5 to 1 B) 4 to 1 C) 3 to 1 D) 2 to 1

Scoring by correct count: 18+ Excellent 16-17 Very good 14-15 Good 10-13 You need to catch up <10 Have you tried Bridge?

Spoiler:
Answers 1.C 2.D 3.B 4.A 5.D 6.A 7.B 8.D 9.C 10.A 11.A 12.E 13.A 14.B 15.B 16.A 17.D 18. 11 19. B 20. B


If you’re not happy with your score you might want to check out a new poker-math blog site, Hold ‘em Mathology on Tumblr. It has basic and advanced hold’em math articles.

https://holdemmathology.tumblr.com
Test Your Poker Math Ability Quote
01-10-2019 , 07:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by statmanhal
If you’re not happy with your score you might want to check out a new poker-math blog site, Hold ‘em Mathology on Tumblr. It has basic and advanced hold’em math articles.

https://holdemmathology.tumblr.com
Hi Hal.

After checking this out, I don't think you will be able to solve any of the EV without assigning position to the players. Then for a more applicable result, also ranges for the players. I know this is just considered an introduction to EV, but you can not even get a usable EV result without position for the players and ranges.

Rob
Test Your Poker Math Ability Quote
01-10-2019 , 08:14 PM
I fully recognize the importance of ranges and position (and a host of other factors such as stack sizes and tells and xxx) in poker analysis.

The site is focused on Poker Math. Given pot and bet sizes and card and fold equity estimates I show how to do the EV math. The most general EV equation Pr(Win)*Win Amt – Pr(Lose)*Lose Amt does not explicitly depend on position or ranges. Sure, the probabilities and amounts can depend on ranges and position but that is outside the scope of the introductory posts now on the site.

I often note here on 2P2 that a math-based result that I may have posted should be modified as applicable for factors not explicitly considered. I will make sure I do that on the site as well. Thanks for the comment.
Test Your Poker Math Ability Quote
01-10-2019 , 09:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by statmanhal
I fully recognize the importance of ranges and position (and a host of other factors such as stack sizes and tells and xxx) in poker analysis.

The site is focused on Poker Math. Given pot and bet sizes and card and fold equity estimates I show how to do the EV math. The most general EV equation Pr(Win)*Win Amt – Pr(Lose)*Lose Amt does not explicitly depend on position or ranges. Sure, the probabilities and amounts can depend on ranges and position but that is outside the scope of the introductory posts now on the site.

I often note here on 2P2 that a math-based result that I may have posted should be modified as applicable for factors not explicitly considered. I will make sure I do that on the site as well. Thanks for the comment.
While the math you are demonstrating is commonly considered Poker Math, it is not game theory math or math that can lead to useful application to the real game of poker.

The best way to illustrate this is to assign position to the players. Ranges naturally follow, but are not required for basic game theory.

So, again, I say assign position now and save yourself quite a headache later.

Last edited by robert_utk; 01-10-2019 at 09:32 PM.
Test Your Poker Math Ability Quote

      
m