Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Some poker numbers question Some poker numbers question

10-18-2018 , 09:53 AM
Hi, guys !
I was trying to get some poker numbers by myself and the answers that I got were a bit different when compared to the ones from this thread which seems pretty reliable.

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/2...d-flop-242373/

So, what are the chances for a "bad flop" when holding KK ? (ace on the flop without a set)

-chances for an ace-high flop
1 - (48/52 x 47/51 x 46/50) = 1 - 0,783 = 21.7%

In the brackets I calculated the chances that ace won't be on the flop which is 78,3% and that means that ace will be on the flop 21.7%.
This number (21.7%) should be correct as I found the same one later on the internet somewhere.

- chances to flop a set/quads when holding KK
1 - (48/50 x 47/49 x 46/48) = 1 - 0,8824 = 1 - 88.24% = 11.76%

I did the similar calculation in the brackets again. Ik that brackets are not needed but it's better visually.

And now finally !****
To have a bad flop for KK we need to:
- miss a set/quads (88.24%)
- have an ace high flop (21.7%)

88.24% x 21.7% = 19.1%****

And some numbers that were mentioned in that post were:
-20.67%
-23.43%
-22.6%
-23%


What am I doing wrong ?

This looks so nerdy, it is just a few percent difference.
But try to understand me and ty in advance !
Some poker numbers question Quote
10-18-2018 , 11:57 AM
There are lots of ways to do this. I prefer combos whenever possible. The following calculates the number of ways of getting 1, 2, or 3 aces and no king on the flop:

Pr=[C(4,1)*C(44,2)+C(4,2)*C(44,1)+C(4,3)]/C(50,3) = 20.67%

I verified this result using my flop simulation program.

I think I’m ok doing these kind of problems but I’m not that good on finding errors of others. I think your error is that you did not do the conditioning correctly given you first calculate no flop ace without regard to your KK holding.

Last edited by statmanhal; 10-18-2018 at 12:04 PM.
Some poker numbers question Quote
10-18-2018 , 12:23 PM
Hi, statmanhal

I will try that now

46/50 x 45/49 x 44/48 = 0,7745

0.7745 = 77,45%
1 - 77.45% = 22.6%

88.24% x 22.6% = 20%

Hmmmm, at least I am getting closer.


Pr=[C(4,1)*C(44,2)+C(4,2)*C(44,1)+C(4,3)]/C(50,3) = 20.67%

I've seen ppl writing these equations but I don't understand them.
Can you like explain it more detailed what are you doing there exactly ?
(imagine that you are explaining it to a 10 year old, just in case )
Some poker numbers question Quote
10-18-2018 , 04:28 PM
Look at this thread in the Beginner's Forum

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/3...t=mathenoobics

Regarding my equation

Pr=[C(4,1)*C(44,2)+C(4,2)*C(44,1)+C(4,3)]/C(50,3) = 20.67%

Combos = number of ways of choosing r things out of n =C(n,r)= nCr = n!/[r!*(n-r)!]

C(5,2)= 5*4*3*2*1/[(2*1)*(3*2*1)]= 5*4/2 = 10

You want 1, 2 or 3 aces and no king.

You hold 2 kings leaving a deck of 50 cards. C(4,1) is the number of ways of getting 1 of 4 aces. There are 50-6 = 44 cards that are neither aces or kings. You want the other two flop cards to be from this sub-deck. The number of ways is C(44,2). If event 1 can happen in N1 ways and event 2 can happen in N2 ways, they both happen in N1 x N2 ways. That now represents the first term in my equation. Similar reasoning applies to the other two enumerator terms.

The total number of flops is the number of ways of choosing 3 cards from a 50 card deck, and that is the denominator.

Probability is then number of ways for an event to happen divided by the total number of ways.
Some poker numbers question Quote
10-18-2018 , 11:21 PM
Thx for the explanation, I understand it now.

But I really hate calculating something with formulas or methods that I don't understand and to ONLY use them because they are correct, if you know what I mean.

I rather try to do it my way regardless of the extra time or possible failure.

And that link doesn't work...
Some poker numbers question Quote
10-19-2018 , 03:03 PM
Try this

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/3...t=mathenoobics

I just did and it worked for me.
Some poker numbers question Quote

      
m