Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Thanks for the response.
Of course, it is absolutely & indisputably incorrect. Probably a waste of time explaining why, as you've shown a complete and utter refusal to listen to anyone, but what the hell.
Each deck is independent of one another, just like each deal from a single deck after it has been shuffled is independent of one another. The order you distribute those shuffled decks is irrelevant, and how you distribute them among different tables is irrelevant.
Also, this is not possible:
"The randomness never changes on either table in your setup. The randomness never changes, let me make that clear that random is random.
In your setup , table two would have a slightly different sequencing/pattern"
Either it's random, or it's not.
I thought you had understood for a minute, understand ostensible, do not be objective without looking in depth at this, withhold judgement .
The randomness of the game is not the problem. Let me try to explain a quantum leap to you. This stuff I am on about is advanced physics, so I will try to explain in simple terms.
Let us look at a simple sequence of 1,2,3,4,5
Now in order left to right you receive 1,2,3,4,5/t where t is time
Now what happens if we decide to stop the ''conveyor'' belt and randomly pick values?
Now we can have any order example 2,1,4,3,5/t
Do you agree with this so far?
Last edited by pkdk; 03-01-2018 at 06:23 PM.