Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
OFC Probability Help OFC Probability Help

04-23-2020 , 07:08 PM
Okay suppose you have the following in 27 OFC

A
23457
QQT

On the third draw you receive A62 and are deciding whether or not to put the A up top. What are the odds of making a Q, T, or a pocket pair in the final three card pull? Your two discards were 99.

For those of you unfamiliar with 27 OFC the question is essentially this:

You have seen 223456799TQQAA (fourteen cards)

You are then dealt a three card hand, what is prob that hand contains at least a Q, a ten, or a pocket pair?

Combinatorics seemed like easiest way but maybe I have quarantine brain and I'm missing something but I'm getting an unreasonable answer.

The denominator is C(38,3) = 8,436

Just starting out with the Qs and Ts I have:

Pair Queens, QQX where X could be anything = 2*1*36 =72

Pair Tens, TTX where X can be anything but Q = 3*1*34 = 204

QTX where X can't be a Q or T = 2*3*33 =198

QXX where X can't be Q or T = 2*33*32 = 2112

TXX where X can't be Q or T = 3*33*32 = 3168

I'm massively overstating this so I'm doing something wrong, can someone point me in right direction?
OFC Probability Help Quote
04-23-2020 , 10:00 PM
You basically did permutations in the numerator for the XX cases and several minor errors.

The easiest way IMO is to see how many ways you will not select a Q or T (33) and subtract that from 1.0

Pr = 1 - C(33,3)/C(38,3) = 35.3%

Last edited by statmanhal; 04-23-2020 at 10:25 PM.
OFC Probability Help Quote
04-23-2020 , 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by statmanhal
You basically did permutations in the numerator for the XX cases.

The easiest way IMO is to see how many ways you will not select a Q or T (33) and subtract that from 1.0

Pr = 1 - C(33,3)/C(38,3) = 35.3%
Thanks man, yeah I can match that 35% from doing it from a probability standpoint using 1-Probability you miss all three.

But the pocket pairs seem tougher so I tried to do the entire thing from combinatorics and testing to see if I could match the 35%.

Could you assist with the pocket pairs?

For example what is the probability of JJX where I imagine X is not a Q or a T to avoid double counting.
OFC Probability Help Quote
04-23-2020 , 11:02 PM
I get 2.1%. It will be different for other ranks if some have removed cards.
OFC Probability Help Quote
04-24-2020 , 12:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by statmanhal
I get 2.1%. It will be different for other ranks if some have removed cards.
Awesome, what would it be for a pair of deuces then since there are two out?

Can you show me some work so I can learn?

Thank you for all of this
OFC Probability Help Quote
04-24-2020 , 09:30 AM
I agree that it's easier here to find the chance of it not happening.

C(33,3)/C(38,3) = chance of no T's or Q's, from which we need to subtract P(pocket pair | no T or Q)

Of the other 11 ranks:
3 of the them have 2 cards remaining, so 1 two-card combo
7 of them have 3 cards remaining, so 3 combos
1 has all 4 cards remaining, so 6 combos

So P(pocket pair | no T or Q) = 3(3 + 7*3 + 6)/C(33,2) - 2(7+4)/C(33,3) = 16.64%
(If having a pocket set doesn't count, the bold 2 should be a 3.)

I multiplied the 2-card probability by C(3,2) since we get 3 pocket cards. However, the sets are then triple-counted, so I subtracted them twice. Seven of the ranks have 1 set combo and one rank has 4 combos.

If you're not comfortable with that approach, you can also have a single denominator of C(33,3) and the following numerator: 3*31 + 7(3*30 + 1) + 6*29 + 4

And now we're done: 1 - C(33,3)/C(38,3) + .1664 = 51.97%
OFC Probability Help Quote
04-24-2020 , 10:36 AM
Oh wait, I think it's probably 46.09%

I said P(not) = P(no Q or T) - P(pocket pair | no Q or T)

But I suspect that's a fallacy, because it disagrees with: P(not) = P(no Q or T)*P(no pocket pair | no Q or T)

We can either multiply C(33,3)/C(38,3) by (1-.1664), or from the start we can do:

[C(33,3) - (3*31 + 7(3*30 + 1) + 6*29 + 4)] / C(38,3)

Subtracting that from 1, we get 46.09%
OFC Probability Help Quote
04-24-2020 , 11:11 AM
Yeah definitely 46.09%

You can say N(not) = N(no Q or T) - N(pair | no Q or T)

but you can't do that with probabilities because the given condition isn't a given unless you're multiplying. It would be valid to do:

P(not) = P(no Q or T) - P(non-QQ/TT pair)
or
P(not) = P(no Q or T)*P(no pocket pair | no Q or T)
or
P(not) = [N(no Q or T) - N(pair | no Q or T)] / N(total)
OFC Probability Help Quote
04-24-2020 , 01:24 PM
Thanks heehaw, but I’m sorry I had a little trouble following some of this. So your final conclusion is that the probability associated with getting a pocket (or trips) eg. JJX (where X not Q or T) is around 11%?
OFC Probability Help Quote
04-24-2020 , 07:45 PM
Yup, 10.76% is the chance of a pocket pair/trips (other than QQ/TT) and no Q or T.
35.33% is the chance of any Q or T and possibly any pocket pair.
OFC Probability Help Quote
04-24-2020 , 07:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by heehaww
Yup, 10.76% is the chance of a pocket pair/trips (other than QQ/TT) and no Q or T.
35.33% is the chance of any Q or T and possibly any pocket pair.
Thank you very much
OFC Probability Help Quote
04-29-2020 , 08:21 AM
I know you didn't ask about best play, but what's the opponent's hand? Is he in fantasy? If he is not and the 6 is live, a 3-out kicker on the last draw always has a better chance of pairing than making a pocket pair. The extra royalties and hand equity from FH/Quads is not worth the extra foul chance.

However I don't think you should play the A on top here. You have 8 royalties, fantasy and you can never be scooped so risking a 50%-ish foul seems bad. What are the FL rules if you get both AA and a nut wheel?
OFC Probability Help Quote
05-02-2020 , 02:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by browni3141
I know you didn't ask about best play, but what's the opponent's hand? Is he in fantasy? If he is not and the 6 is live, a 3-out kicker on the last draw always has a better chance of pairing than making a pocket pair. The extra royalties and hand equity from FH/Quads is not worth the extra foul chance.

However I don't think you should play the A on top here. You have 8 royalties, fantasy and you can never be scooped so risking a 50%-ish foul seems bad. What are the FL rules if you get both AA and a nut wheel?
Thanks brown, good post man. I wanted to get this probability to do some calcs and figure out the best play.

I assumed the opponent was in FL. And I calculated that playing it safe does better by around 2 points than choosing to gamble here. However, if we have 23467 we would gamble.

AA and nut wheel would give you a 15 card FL. Do you have any opinions on the value of a 14 card and 15 FL? I assumed 6 points for 14 card FL and 8 for 15 card FL, is that reasonable iyo?

And you are indeed correct that it is correct to play a live kicker on the bottom as that increases the odds of not fouling.
OFC Probability Help Quote
05-02-2020 , 04:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScotchOnDaRocks
AA and nut wheel would give you a 15 card FL. Do you have any opinions on the value of a 14 card and 15 FL? I assumed 6 points for 14 card FL and 8 for 15 card FL, is that reasonable iyo?
I haven't played much of the low variant. In standard OFCP 14 card FL is considered by most sources to be about 7.5-8 points. I really can't guess how much the extra card is worth or how much FL is worth in 2-7 in the middle.
OFC Probability Help Quote
05-02-2020 , 04:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by browni3141
I haven't played much of the low variant. In standard OFCP 14 card FL is considered by most sources to be about 7.5-8 points. I really can't guess how much the extra card is worth or how much FL is worth in 2-7 in the middle.
Ok thanks, according to people who have studied it FL is worth less in 27 and many think its around 6. Couldn’t find anything on 15 card so I just bumped it up a few points
OFC Probability Help Quote
06-11-2020 , 09:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by heehaww
Yup, 10.76% is the chance of a pocket pair/trips (other than QQ/TT) and no Q or T.
35.33% is the chance of any Q or T and possibly any pocket pair.
heehaw, can you confirm the following?

Prob totally live pair w/ no Q/T is: C(4,2)*(29,1)/8436 = 2.1%

Prob pair with one card dead w/ no Q/T is C(3,2)*C(30,1)/8436 = 1.1%

Prob pair with two card dead w/ no Q/T is C(2,2)*C(31,1)/8436 = .4%

For example, prob 99 with no Q/T is .4% but prob 88 with no Q/T is 2.1%, is this correct?
OFC Probability Help Quote
06-15-2020 , 11:29 AM
Exactly, assuming trips aren't allowed.
OFC Probability Help Quote

      
m