Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletcher2323
Also, if there’s another cashier sitting nearby he/she is going to overhear a customer say “you shorted me $100.” And the second time that happens, you’re screwed.
Sure it is risky. Usually when this has happened they are the only cashier working in the vicinity, even if there is another employee near by they have little incentive to rat them out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord_Crispen
I mean, it's a net positive to have a story that might make people check their chip counts and cash outs more diligently, but I tend to think the motivation behind the shortage is less important. This is almost always just a mistake and not someone trying to swindle. I know the common elitist attitude toward these sorts of things on this forum sits on the "It's their job, how can they get it wrong?" side of the fence, but really, these are low paying positions and it's easy (not read as 'excusable') to make mistakes because of fatigue or just sheer laziness and being on autopilot. Effectively, it's irrelevant though. Count your money.
Exactly, either way it is prudent to double check you chip count and the cash received.
Quote:
Originally Posted by psandman
While its possible this is intentional I think you are way off base with your assumption that it is intentional.
First of all cashiers do not know all the camera angles ... cashiers aren;t generally invited into the surveillance room and the use of PTZ cameras means you never know where the focus is.
Second if they want to steal the more effective way is not to short a single customer $100 but to short many customers small inconsequential amounts throughout the day and keep track ... and then close to end of shift slip out the total amount..... customers are far ;ess likely to notice a $5 shortage then a $100 shortage....
And this is true of any cashier not just casino cashiers.
I would agree most errors are honest mistakes, and that's what makes the scam so clever and allows the potential scammer to operate with impunity.
I think there is a psychological basis for why scammers choose to skim precisely $100 off, if the first two digits are correct and then the 3rd digit is only off by 1, seems like it's more likely to trick people even if the counted down their stack prior to getting to the window.
I don't think nickel and diming would have a better EV for the scammer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suit
I can assure you this is incorrect.
How many times exactly have you seen this happen? It is very unlikely that there are cashiers constantly doing this. I wouldn't put it past them to try it once in awhile on bigger cashouts with an intoxicated patron or something, but they have to be straight stupid to think they will get away with walking out of the cage with more money in their pocket than they came in with. Then again, most thieves are not smart.
Cashiers make mistakes all the time. Most times it gets caught by the customer and corrected. Then there are those times it is in the customers favor and the customer remains silent. The cashier's bank comes up short and they get in trouble. Sometimes the customer is shorted and they don't know it. The cashier's bank comes up over and they still get in trouble. I can promise you one thing that is true is that more times their banks come up short than over and I am willing to bet that is because more often than not the customer knowingly took the surplus.
I think I've seen this set up (being shorted exactly $100) about a dozen times.
Pointless to level accusations when intent can't ever be proven, just wanted people to be aware of the possibility.
Quote:
Originally Posted by madlex
Do you as a regular customer know all the camera angles by virtue of being there every day?
Pretty sure the average poker player sees the inside of the surveillance area exactly as often as the average cashier.
Just anecdotally, the majority of the times they check the cameras in the poker room for a ruling it comes back "inconclusive".
Regardless, people get fired all the time for stealing, usually they get away with it many times before they are eventually caught.
Last edited by pure_aggression; 12-29-2017 at 02:05 PM.