That wasn't your original claim though

I am curious, can Jonathan use the footage from Rampage like here? Is this under fair use?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8gg...-PokerCoaching

I am new to youtube and really wonder if I can make clips of e.g. hustler stream to heavily edit, comment on etc, even comment on other vlogger content without being called a douche :]

Well it wasn't lots of youtubers would be out of business

You can not use copyright video of any length of time on youtube without consent.
However it happens heavily.
If you spend 40 hours editing a video that gets 100k views just to be demonitized for using a HCL clip it would not be fun.

But clearly there must be some frames where Robbi's hair is vibrating or Ryan Feldman walks by and kicks her (unconfirmed)

I say the best poker YouTubers are the ones who do something that no one else provides to the poker community, like coverage of poker media (television, movies, etc).

Ahem...The Two Fish at the Table Podcast...

Stuff you won't see anywhere else?

-Breaking down every year of the WSOP Main Event broadcasts
-Reviewing the short lived ESPN show: Tilt (in all its failures)
-An unprecedented 3 hour interview with Greg Raymer
-And much more.

link bro i will sub and watch

Jonathan for sure has Rampage's permission to use his content, they have made content together both for Youtube and on PokerCoaching.com. Jonathan also (usually) mentions and thanks streams that are featured on his Youtube channel for allowing him to use the conent.

https://www.youtube.com/@thetwofishatthetablepodcas9199

unpopular opinion: the best grinders with the biggest stable winrates don't stream, at least not for free.

if you decide to stream, it is most likely infotainment. those who stream aim to make money from community building, not the game itself.

they want to entertain and are most likely not able to compete in the tuffest games.

some streamers where crushers back then and decided to build something more ppl related.

both sides of the coin are reliable but imo, those who stream poker should not be taken for top tier of the game.

That's not an unpopular opinion, really, more or less a fact. At least when it comes to widespread content creation in tough formats - when you grind at the top online it takes a lot of effort studying to keep on par, most of the guys release content when they stop trying their hardest.

It's also the case for me - I realized that I just don't have what it takes to keep up with my peers in cash games (I was literally sweating and studying with Linus and Wiktor/Limitless at NL25 - NL50 ), never played higher than NL400, I'm getting old, so I started making content to diversify couple months back. If I was on my way up I'd never put in this much effort - these days putting out quality content on modern platforms takes a lot of effort, analysis, and study of the algorhythms. When you reach a certain mass you need teams to keep growing - you spend the time you could be spending studying, grinding and looking for better games instead.

Hey,

I would like to make a first step in this direction and post a link to my educational YouTube poker channel.
Beginners and intermediate players have found a wealth of info on this channel. I'm definitely nowhere near perfect yet but improving every day, both at YouTubing and poker.
https://www.youtube.com/@LivePokerGuide

Thanks for the link. I have subbed, looks interesting.

I'm always looking for co-operations, so maybe we can do something together.

Here't the link to my channel if you're interested:
https://www.youtube.com/@LivePokerGuide

Absolutely!


We'd love to collaborate with you!

Cool, I have sent you a private message.

Scotty Meltzer is pretty bad. It 5 guys who don't really know what's going on talking over eachother. The streams also lack any real direction.

Love, LOVE the graphic

raph darko

Blasphemy

+1. Absolute trash.

Add anyone from the UK other than specifically Ben. I'm sure I haven't seen all of them, but the ones I have are both trash and insufferable.

Tbf Raph isn't saying he's great at poker or selling coaching or anything. He's an entertainment streamer which helps the games by getting fish in

he constantly calls people nits but if you look at his stats he is a bigger nit than all of them. don't have anything against the guy personally, just insufferable to watch.

Doesn't he also literally call himself ''the lord''?

Anyways watched him once or twice, nothing amusing about him. Just an obnoxious **** reg.

PaulPunts. He says things like "I think we have to do x action here" way too often

Also just not that good

https://www.instagram.com/p/C-R24_WMLyt/?hl=en

I can't believe no one has mentioned the trooper yet

Who wouldn't click on this video?

I watch a lot of Jonathon Little.

Pros

- Shares GTO ranges for a variety of situations
- Knowledgeable
- Works with pros that are better than him on his website (TMK)
- Winning live tournament player

Cons

- No editor on his videos (...and he needs one badly)
- He's autistic or something; which is actually fine, just really didn't like when he talked down to his own child who was looking for help while he was filming a video
- I'm 90% certain he's not following GTO when he plays; despite knowing GTO (To be fair; neither do I)
- RFI + amounts are irrelevant for most of a tournament, and not very applicable for low stakes cash games (Good players probe for amounts; he suggests flat amounts like many others)


I have a big issue with GTO advocates, but there are lots of pieces of information worth learning about from him. (..Like which hands to 3b with)

My issue with GTO; is that it's not GTO.

GTO isn't magic; and there are select conditions that need to be occurring for it to be useful. Those conditions aren't conditions most of us will be experiencing. The best players will tell you "exploits are better"; but what they won't tell you is the follow up to that..."and GTO is trash unless you're tilted and need to fall back on something".

I like this video on the topic; it kind of illustrates my point.

Here's Tom Dwan playing 72o

My issue with GTO in the tournament space; is that usually the best path to victory isn't GTO. In low stakes cash games; the best path to victory isn't GTO.

GTO isn't GTO because for most people following it would lose you money/chips.