Hi, ATrain. Thanks for the feedback on this. I can understand why it would be upsetting, and I hope we didn't come across as endorsing this. In the interview, Conrad does express regret for participating in the exploitation of these players (I'm not sure your description is quite accurate, though Conrad admittedly talks about it in similar terms - my understanding is that there was no posted rake, and the people running the game instructed him to just grab what he could from the pots - exploitative, certainly, but doesn't rise to the level of theft IMO).
We try to put a wide variety of guests on the show. Some of them are people who have done things they aren't proud of (probably all of them are, since they are all human beings, but some of them are more honest about it and/or their transgressions are more well known). My policy is that as long as people are wiling to speak openly and honestly about things, I'm not going to shun them. I have many times turned down interviews from people who had not expressed contrition for their actions and who I suspected were trying to use the podcast to rehab their image and gloss over those transgressions. Likewise, there are many well-known poker players I've not sought out for interviews because I don't think they would be willing to talk openly about the questionable things they've been involved with.
That's all just to explain, not necessarily to excuse. This is a tricky issue, and I respect that there's a chance I'm wrong, or at least that this interview wasn't for you. I appreciate you being such a long time listener. AFAIK our next guest has a squeaky clean reputation :-)
For those curious, the guest in question is Conrad Simpson:
https://www.thinkingpoker.net/2022/0...onrad-simpson/. He talks about how he used to deal in private games where he was encouraged to pull as much money out of the pot as he could, with some of what he took going to the house and some going to him.