Quote:
Originally Posted by arcdog
@DC2LV the big thing is paying the man 10k so kudos to Phil, but the fact is that Phil has apologized for his “outburst” but still laughably insists he did nothing unethical that influenced the hand. He’s never able to admit anything along those lines, including here.
That is simply not true. You are conflating two separate things. Phil admitted his rant and telegraphing of hand strength was entirely inappropriate, against the rules, and said he deserved a penalty for it.
He went on to say that if the Russian had folded, he was calling with 77, and the kid would've lost anyway. Now it's very debatable whether he would've actually called or not had the Russian folded. But nowhere did he "insist he did nothing unethical", in fact he admitted quite the opposite.