Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirbynator
i think kripp plays/understands the game very well usually, just not used with how to play specific tournament decks.
he often sees better plays than the pro players that commentate with him.
I agree that Chakki seemed on another level than everyone else he was talking with. But that's a guy thats been playing constructed only since day 1.
Oh, and he's not ******ed like Gnimsh
The problem with Kripp is not his knowledge, it's that he's the kind of guy that always has to be right, so he interrupts and talks over other commentators, and often refuses to acknowledge when the players make a play that turns out to be better than his suggested play. Obv he's a very smart guy and good at hearthstone but he needs to be reigned in somewhat. Noxious is similar in his casting style and it's very annoying.
Admirable and Tannon Grace, who is apparently a very well regard MTG player, are loltastic together. They mix the players up and miss the reasoning for fairly basic plays. They harped on Ostkaka for his entire series vs Sjow in the HPL this week because he chose not to armor up on turn 4 playing Grim Patron when he had double battle rage in hand, and they asked Dog twice about deck choices that he made that were actually made by his opponent.
I agree wrt Chakki. He seems to have matured a lot in the last year and is a great caster.