Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > >

Notices

Home Poker Discussions of home poker games

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-05-2018, 03:35 PM   #1
IhateJJ
journeyman
 
IhateJJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 239
Winners Tax

Consider these two methods of collecting "rake"for the house:

1. Traditional rake of $X flat per hand (i.e, $5 per hand if a flop is seen)
2. Tax the winners of the game X% of their net profit for the session, but no rake/hand.

So, in case 2, the winners of the game will be paying all the rake to the house at the end. The losers will feel like they at least didn't pay any rake.

What are the pros/cons with each methodology? Obviously, the consistent winners of the game would prefer case 1. But, to entice the losers to keep playing, or attract new losers to the game, what is the tipping point that the winners could accept in case 2 to keep playing? What level would the winners tax have to be set at to allow the winners to maintain their current win rates? Is having one donkey in the lineup enough, or do the winners need 4 or 5 guys dumping off cash each week? Does average stack depth people are playing with influence this calculation? Short handed vs full ring? PLO vs NL Holdem? Any thoughts on this would be appreciated!
IhateJJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2018, 04:23 PM   #2
BigBlue56
veteran
 
BigBlue56's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 2,617
Re: Winners Tax

Rake and home poker just don't seem right to me. $5 per hands on a flop sounds like at least a $1-$2 game, and taking hundreds of dollars in rake per session. Not quite home poker, more underground poker room.

That being said:

I don't like 2. I think most losers either don't realize how much they lose, how often they lose and/or don't want to be embarrassed by it being known when they cash out. I think it's a sure way to drive them out.

It also shines light on the amount of rake taken off the table. Most players aren't going to realize how much rake they pay through the session, but tax them at the end to make up for all the hands played, they may revolt. After 100 hands have been played to a flop, you are expecting to take $500 off the table. How much do you think players are going to be up after 100 hands? What percentage of the winnings is $500 going to be?

Managing the stacks could also be an issue. If I'm playing with a buddy, and one of us is up and the other down, it makes sense for the up player to dump chips at the end to the player that it down. Pay less on the "winnings' and have the chips dumped returned to the winner. IE I'm up $150 and my buddy is down $100. I dump $100 to him, pay tax on the $50 and collect the $100 back from him outside.
BigBlue56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2018, 08:31 PM   #3
sw_emigre
old hand
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: resurfacing
Posts: 1,275
Re: Winners Tax

If you don't want to rake per hand, do a time charge.
sw_emigre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2018, 09:30 AM   #4
Bene Gesserit
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Bene Gesserit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: my old Kentucky Home
Posts: 6,306
Re: Winners Tax

Or a seat charge for the session, if you must rake the game for expenses in a home game or for profit in an underground room.
Bene Gesserit is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2008-2017, Two Plus Two Interactive
 
 
Poker Players - Streaming Live Online