tasttyyy/strawberry milk issues
08-19-2018
, 03:20 PM
08-20-2018
, 08:28 AM
My security service got the information about you and I decided to refuse you, Bogdan, as polite as possible, saying you live in a nice city and reminding you that "money does not bring happiness" . I meant the money you have stolen. All our chat log and proofs I can send the Moderator.
Seems to me, I am going to make a new thread about another scammer.
If you guys don't understand who Bogdan is I will tell you.
His nickname is ProfetuN1.
I bet you all remember that guy https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/1...-years-655727/
Now you all know another "hero" of the world of poker.
08-20-2018
, 10:47 AM
08-20-2018
, 12:03 PM
Quote:
Milking that reply for all its worth, aren't you? Do you even know what troll means?
Oh really? Amazing, is it? Well, I can't wait to see why you think it's amazing...
Oh, I see. So you don't have anything further.
Since you didn't specify, it would seem that's a blanket denial of all those accounts being you. I guess that would include:
OtB_RedBaron - Well, we know that's you because you said yourself "the only time I vouched myself was off the otb_redbaron account"
sixana - This account already shared an IP with you, 2 IPs with mame, and another with your coach, who is roommates with you - and sixana's PG&C thread starts by touting that same coach. And then sixana posted in this thread just a few hours after OtB, from an IP in the same range.
mame - After you started the staking thread I linked in my last post with your tasttyyy account, mame posted "sick grinder, gl" from the same IP, 2 minutes later.
lucky<3 - This account was used in the tasttyyy PG&C mess I linked earlier. Posted some stats, presumably to support tasttyyy, 8 minutes after one of tasttyyy's posts, from the same IP. A little later that day, tasttyyy posted from a different IP, which lucky<3 then posted from, 33 times over the next hour or so, interspersed with another tasttyyy post - again, all of this coming from that same IP.
lnternetRobinHood - that account shares IPs with lucky<3 and your roommate.
Which leaves us with precisely 2 accounts I also believe are yours, that aren't tied to you by IP. I suppose you could be lying your face off about the above accounts, and telling the truth about the other 2 that acted in a similar fashion to those ones. I mean, it could just be a fluke that someone created an account named "ruskiblatta4ra242a" to show up and fire off 16 massive nonsense posts (filled with lines and lines of "a aa aaa" etc) in 20 minutes, on the same day and in the same thread that accusations were being made against you. Much the same way you did with the lucky<3 account, but I'm sure that's just coincidence.
Again, no - you were banned for spamming.
Of course you don't. How do you defend the indefensible? Owing up to things would've been a good start, of course, but I wasn't really expecting that.
Well, I think it's been pretty solidly proven that you constantly use gimmick accounts to attempt to make yourself look better or to try and hide accusations about you, and that you lie an awful lot.
You've done this entirely to yourself. And I have no interest in doing anything to your life - I don't even know you. But I do have an interest in bringing shady situations to light.
This is a serious question? So, you're thinking that if someone who doesn't have an account here sees someone posting that could be a risk to others, they should have to wait 6 months to alert the community? Who would such a rule benefit, I wonder?
I don't think it's really all that amazing, but this thread's evidence of why it's a good thing.
I don't think "no evidence" means what you think it means.
Oh really? Amazing, is it? Well, I can't wait to see why you think it's amazing...
Oh, I see. So you don't have anything further.
Since you didn't specify, it would seem that's a blanket denial of all those accounts being you. I guess that would include:
OtB_RedBaron - Well, we know that's you because you said yourself "the only time I vouched myself was off the otb_redbaron account"
sixana - This account already shared an IP with you, 2 IPs with mame, and another with your coach, who is roommates with you - and sixana's PG&C thread starts by touting that same coach. And then sixana posted in this thread just a few hours after OtB, from an IP in the same range.
mame - After you started the staking thread I linked in my last post with your tasttyyy account, mame posted "sick grinder, gl" from the same IP, 2 minutes later.
lucky<3 - This account was used in the tasttyyy PG&C mess I linked earlier. Posted some stats, presumably to support tasttyyy, 8 minutes after one of tasttyyy's posts, from the same IP. A little later that day, tasttyyy posted from a different IP, which lucky<3 then posted from, 33 times over the next hour or so, interspersed with another tasttyyy post - again, all of this coming from that same IP.
lnternetRobinHood - that account shares IPs with lucky<3 and your roommate.
Which leaves us with precisely 2 accounts I also believe are yours, that aren't tied to you by IP. I suppose you could be lying your face off about the above accounts, and telling the truth about the other 2 that acted in a similar fashion to those ones. I mean, it could just be a fluke that someone created an account named "ruskiblatta4ra242a" to show up and fire off 16 massive nonsense posts (filled with lines and lines of "a aa aaa" etc) in 20 minutes, on the same day and in the same thread that accusations were being made against you. Much the same way you did with the lucky<3 account, but I'm sure that's just coincidence.
Again, no - you were banned for spamming.
Of course you don't. How do you defend the indefensible? Owing up to things would've been a good start, of course, but I wasn't really expecting that.
Well, I think it's been pretty solidly proven that you constantly use gimmick accounts to attempt to make yourself look better or to try and hide accusations about you, and that you lie an awful lot.
You've done this entirely to yourself. And I have no interest in doing anything to your life - I don't even know you. But I do have an interest in bringing shady situations to light.
This is a serious question? So, you're thinking that if someone who doesn't have an account here sees someone posting that could be a risk to others, they should have to wait 6 months to alert the community? Who would such a rule benefit, I wonder?
I don't think it's really all that amazing, but this thread's evidence of why it's a good thing.
I don't think "no evidence" means what you think it means.
Bobo4Prez
08-21-2018
, 02:57 AM
08-21-2018
, 09:40 AM
The security service works great
When a player asks me for staking I request the information about his poker skills and appeal to my security service that checks all the information of a player in all accessible for us sources. Then they share the results with me and I make careful decision on who can and can not be trusted.
If you are a player that had some problems most likely you will be refused.
I hope that I have answered your question
When a player asks me for staking I request the information about his poker skills and appeal to my security service that checks all the information of a player in all accessible for us sources. Then they share the results with me and I make careful decision on who can and can not be trusted.
If you are a player that had some problems most likely you will be refused.
I hope that I have answered your question
09-06-2018
, 05:32 PM