Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcarnage
Nick had however ignored the situation after his post and was hoping this would go away with time, but as both players are known in the Local community it exploded and got 1,000+ Posts and he was unsure of what to do at that point, it put him in a pretty ****ty spot IMO.
Exactly when did he "ignore" the situation?
The tourney took place on Sat-Sun, June 17 & 18. The situation apparently simmered on Monday, and then Nick wrote a post explaining his position on Tuesday night, June 20, and posted it just after midnight. Eric wrote back early Wednesday morning at 3:27am, and then Nick wrote again on Thursday night, June 22nd, offering to have the financial dispute arbitrated by an impartial third-party. Your buddy Eric apparently rejected that out-of-hand (for no plausible reason), and then you took it upon yourself to give Nick an ultimatum with a deadline of June 25th. BTW, it makes no ****ing sense at all for you to issue an ultimatum in this matter rather than to let the two parties work this out themselves.
So I ask you once again, when exactly did Nick even have any time to "ignore" the matter, especially given your intrusion?
I'll also ask you once again why you believe that a professional arbitrator couldn't resolve this fairly simple matter that revolves around a difference of opinion?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcarnage
This is my personal two cents trying to not be Biased here.
You haven't written one word in this thread that wasn't completely 100% biased against Nick.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcarnage
But it seems like a logical explanation for how it went down to me...
I'm sure it does. Especially when you write in your completely unbiased frame of mind
that "Nick had tried to clear his name
and pretend he has done nothing wrong".
You didn't write simply that Nick provided his explanation; or even write that Nick believes he did nothing wrong. No, you already reached your determination, and acting as judge and supreme arbiter of this matter, looked into his state of mind and concluded that he was
pretending that he did nothing wrong.
And this is your idea of an unbiased logical explanation of how it went down, lol.
No wonder Nick wants this decided by an impartial arbitrator rather than you deep thinkers in your Alberta poker group.