Quote:
Originally Posted by Pagasses...
I see Marcin friends discussing taxes, contracts "viability"( if they are legal/ force people to pay or are worthless), if site is legal or not but i dont see any of them justifying him playing off stake games which is the same as stealing, not having 10 mins during months to answer and update his backers...
The thing with poker stars closing his account...do you really think stars is closing accounts without strong evidence that you are guilty?
Now he says he will return to poker. One day he wants to be a Doctor the other he wants to be an Astronaut.
IMO you are scummy as hell and you owe 100% of make up.
Good job your opinion is worthless then isn't it as you clearly are biased with your see my coaching subtitle and totally clueless also. Stars have banned or restricted many peoples account for having a relationship with another person be it transferring funds or playing from the same IP address. Playing some off stake games and replacing the funds is far from stealing. If pocarr had such a huge problem with this "theft" why are we waiting till now to hear about it? Because it suited their purpose at the time and were happy to keep making money. Now the money making machine has grinded to a halt all previous transgressions are being revealed because it suits them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTyman9
Except they aren't going to buy his makeup at anything close to 100%. It would be lower than 25% in all likelihood which is less than the buyout numbers they couldn't even agree to.
Good point seems offering 33% of the total to be repaid over 18 months is extremely fair judging by what the market rate would be for the markup being sold.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KeithMM
It could equally be because making a site involves a cost and the bank isn't gonna do that for no return. they get their money back by foreclosing on the mortgage , selling the house and suing for any shortfall. if you fall behind with bills , you'll likely be taken to court and then find the bailiffs knocking on your door wanting the money or taking your assets to sell and recover the money that way.
Your posts generally come across as intelligent but you clearly have no clue what you're talking about in this regard i suggest you do some research on the subject.
Disregarding the makeup and ethical questions about Marcins conduct pocarr should also have some accountability about how they conduct themselves as well. I have spoken to 3 other stable owners in private and all agree this thread would of never happened as they wouldn't of demanded 100% of the makeup then used the private information they collected as a blackmail tool. Offering to repay 33% of the makeup is a clear case of showing good will. pocarr were even willing to accept 33% but wanted it paid in a week. While i can't condone walking out on makeup and playing poker again while paying nothing pocarrs gestapo tactics have created the whole situation and destroyed any good will on either side.
pocarr fail to mention that Marcin got out of $20k+ makeup on 3 separate occasions. There was a big change in the games that were allowed to be played due to pokerstars putting down the hammer on the ROI of mtts. So this time while in 20+ makeup the games which could be played made the situation seem close to impossible.
Won't deny i am biased either but i have kept everything i posted factual and not made claims of loans that were never repaid when they were and missed out months on the timeline where the horse worked hard and made alot of money.
Last edited by U shove i call; 11-11-2016 at 04:31 PM.