wasnt a stipend necessarily, it was a chop on weekly profits (profits only) with the total of the stake settling on open ended date, no leaving by me in MU. if you didn't agree to this then you didn't understand the deal and can only fault yourself or you are lying

it wasn't going to be a problem until the ds and BF

you were angling for this all along, congrats on another fine witch hunt thread

Yes, you are describing a stipend.

You're saying I allowed you to withdraw money for any purpose other than playing poker.

I categorically deny that. It was a stake to play poker only, and tournament poker at that, not cash. If you were withdrawing money, it was without my knowledge or permission. If you played cash more than that one time you admitted to me (after which I told you I didn't want you doing it), it was without my knowledge or permission.

Yeah, your ridiculous theory that I basically wanted this all along doesn't become less absurd the more you say it.

I've never denied you the ability to transfer make up. For the 101st time (exaggeration, of course, it's probably only 11 or so by now). Feel free to find another backer, I say again and again and again and again and again....

funny too coz I explained my idea of a hi and low chop so the makeup could be kept down if it came to that

you agreed with all of it but I got the feeling you weren't actually paying attention or it was over your head or something

I remember the exact conversation and it was definitely over the phone, so I don't have an email to prove it but that is my contention, that the cash outs she is still bitching about and was from the beginning was something she agreed to

and she still made money off the stake, so who cares? good investment, sorry BF happenend

Jeff Bennett is a liar and a thief.

Post your graphs and any other "proof" you have.

it wasn't a stipend really because I only chopped us in weeks we were in the black, and sometimes I skipped them so the makeup wouldn't build up too much

I'm ready for a verdict.

If she really wants me to go through it, I'm going to go by the original chopping scheme. It may very well show I don't owe her anything.

I did all the work with the numbers after we lowered the chop amount but I lost it and it came to 235 + 665 MU. If I have to do it again, I'm going to use the original chopping scheme and I'm certain she won't be owed anything. It took a few days to do them all, and I was an emotional wreck at the time, so it's possible I made a mistake somewhere. But I'm willing to show all of it if it's necessary. I think 235 is a great deal though. It's what I came up with based on what we both agreed to.

Once again, I think 235 payment to her and deletion of the thread is the correct course of action, and I ask the community to accept this settlement.

After that I would like a formal request to get my SN back.

Well your numbers are meaningless as I dispute your entire "scheme" that ever allowed you to use stake money for anything other than poker.

But sure, I would LOVE to see your numbers.

correction

the MU was 673

Here is the staking deal you agreed to

cash out weeks in profit 50 or 100 depending on the total amount won
chop of the stake calculated at unspecified open ended date 50/50 (we split all profits down the middle at termination)
I cannot leave in makeup

sound familiar or have I lost you yet?

this basically is a way to get paid whether or not I win as long as I don't leave in MU, which I never did. BF left me. If I scammed you it's because poker shutdown. If I quit in MU on this deal, I'm basically free rolling you, so you have to trust me to not leave in MU which I never did. You were correct to make this deal because I never would have left in MU even as people were snapping up my action in the MP

Mmmm-hmmm.

We're still waiting for your proof. Of anything.

I mean I already have proof you're a liar and a thief. From you. I'm waiting to see what you have.

Absolutely, completely, 100% incorrect.

And what kind of reference would that be? A completely frank and honest one, or were there stipulations put on it?

Excellent, I look forward to it. This is what I've been urging you to do all day.

Wait, what?

SGTRJ

I'm going to give you the option one more time. I can go through all the numbers, but it will be based on the original deal of 50 low chop and 100 high chop. You kept bitching about cashouts, so I lowered the amount of the high and low chop later in the deal. If I stick to the original, most of the 235 will show as makeup.

There is a very good chance you get nothing if I go through the numbers, so this is the last time I will make a generous offer. 235 and drop it or I post all the numbers based on the original chop plan and the 235 turns to MU as well, which has expired.

It's amusing that I've started with the most generous offer and moved down and she still won't take it so she has til tomorrow before I prove I owe her nothing. I've been more than fair and this is a joke.

Mmmm-hmmm.

We're still waiting for your proof. Of anything.

I mean I already have proof you're a liar and a thief. From you. I'm waiting to see what you have.

I'm sure your numbers will say whatever you want them to say. Especially if you make up terms of the stake that never existed.

OK how about this Bobo.

I have nothing further to say in this forum except if this thread is not deleted with the numerous mention of me being a theif and publishing of private correspondence doesn't stop, 2p2 will be contact by a lawyer soon

If this thread isn't gone by tomorrow morning I'm going straight to a lawyer and suing for damages of lost potential wages.

LOL

since you guys don't seem to understand I will spell it out for you

If this thread isn't deleted by tomorrow morning I will serve papers in court to have it deleted and sue for damages, including defamation of character, slander.

and i mean it

Good luck with that.

Nothing that you have said has been amusing.

Good luck with that. The correspondence published so far is RJ's correspondence, not yours.

As for the thief and scammer references: if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck ...

He means it.

I'd be worried.

You are so broke that you can't make good on less than $1000 that you have owed for years, yet you have Saul Goodman on retainer ?

I will follow the court case avidly. Please be sure to post the case number and a scan of the pleadings, first thing tomorrow.

meh, as long as it's not the thread title no worries

who cares what she says

I'm not going to pay anything because the terms of the initial deal put the onus on her. It really is her word against mine because we didn't have a written deal in place. It was all verbal.

I've offered every amicable way to settle it and now I'm finished because I don't feel like doing all the detective work to figure out when the smaller chops came in to play. So I think I actually owe her 0 and she's trying to freeroll me by making me pay makeup out of pocket

therefore I'm not paying unless she can prove I scammed her

and I want my SN back and MP privileges

Sadly, I sense disappointment on the horizon for all parties.

Also I've already provided my proof. You acknowledge your debt to me in the June 2011 emails as well as your initial emails to me last wee. Since you're not paying it back, you're a thief as well as a liar.

I was really looking forward to those made up numbers. Alas.

Tell us again how I changed the terms of the stake and you were too scared to complain because I was a mod.

Do you want a pony as well ? Sorry to disappoint, but you won't be getting that either.

34 minutes later in bizarroscammerworld: