Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerPlayingGamble
That seems to be a reasonable solution to me. Horses are allowed to quit poker when in makeup (although they are not allowed to quit the stake in makeup and continue to play poker on their own or under another stable). Since he was not authorized to play 2/4 and 5/10 he could be considered obligated to pay that money back.
If the horse returns to poker, then he must first return to you and offer to allow you to continue staking him, with the makeup intact. If you are unwilling to continue staking him then he can return to poker whenever, just like if you had dropped him.
how about the fact that he withheld important info from me (not having a job and thus potentially not having a good mindset to play; he always had tilt issues which i'm aware of, so if i was truly informed, i could have made a more informed decision which may or may not include taking him on)
i understand the risks of staking and am willing to incur the losses here, i just thought it isn't entirely fair to me cos i wasn't allowed to make the decision to the best of my ability.
the terms which i indicated in the contract, being that a horse can't leave a contract when he's in makeup, is it superceded by the fact that a horse quitting poker will not need to do any makeup?