Guy Taylor/Henry Strudwick Staking Dispute - Page 2 - Transaction Feedback & Disputes -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

Wow. How has anyone read this thoroughly and not supporting Guy Taylor. Fwiw I know none of these guys, but Guy very clearly was acting in good faith and the 3rd....

same here

agree to your post in all aspects.
couldn't have wrote it much better.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Standard Station

Wow. How has anyone read this thoroughly and not supporting Guy Taylor. Fwiw I know none of these guys, but Guy very clearly was acting in good faith and the 3rd staker who has stayed out of this is very clearly on the same page as Guy. Its also undeniable that Adam was not acting in good faith to the business. He dropped out bc he knew Henry wasn't going to win it back(perhaps knew Henry had been losing elsewhere, was going thru mental issues, picked up a habit, who knows). But he straight bounced on his partners then acted against their best interest and tried to lie to all of us about it. How is this not a bigger deal. He was caught clear as day attempting to deceive us(so was Henry, but thats expected given the spot) and thats pretty f'd up.

Pokerplayinggamble, c'mon bro would you send funds to this kid? Who cares if he was willing to play if hes going to play like crap and torch the funds. While at the same time being very unpleasant in their personal discourse. 2 of the stakers, the only remaining 2 for that matter as the one closest to Henry decided to gg the stake didnt trust Henry would play in good faith for them.

I dunno, I was shocked to see the first response was someone against Guy after this pretty thorough and damning rebuttal by Guy that shows how his original statement was definitely factual and that Adam acted without question unethically both to the business and in his response to us where he clearly lied. You hated on him for being thorough and recording conversations? The guy wants to protect his rep which would have been shredded had he not done this. Someone was even suggesting "why isnt this clown banned". Then Guy comes and teabags Henry/Adam and y'all somehow interpret that differently?

I think it's obvious guy is in the right here. 3rd staker is the friend that brought Henry in and is now siding with him imo to save him 30k ish and a long grind back. (I'll find the quote later it's up there) all other stakers or friends are siding with guy so there is another tell. guy is making sense when the other side is not.

I don't know if suing is an option but I think a judge would clearly side with guy.

since all sides seem to want to resolve this an amicable resolution would be best and seems to be on the table.

Quote

05-04-2023 , 09:23 PM

#28

washoe

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2019 Posts: 8,385

I'd like to see some punts from the mtt histories and they would help this case cause what's he going to say? yep I punted and am sorry? what will other backers think of him? it's a terrible reputation that's for certain.
brand-new horse punts and then ditches backer by gas lighting and seeks a new backer. lol? this is a one of the biggest piles of horse **** I have ever heard of. Henry is clear as daylight a loose cannon and is now trying to wiggle his way out. not a good look. yeh Henry what are you going to say? I ****ed up my first backing with 4 good mates coaches and then ditched them with 30k makeup. wtf? seriously?

Quote

05-04-2023 , 09:50 PM

#29

washoe

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2019 Posts: 8,385

Quote:

Originally Posted by PokerPlayingGamble

They deny this and have posted evidence to support their claim. He refused multiple attempts to be reloaded, so the stake was put on hiatus.

yes

Quote

05-04-2023 , 09:51 PM

#30

washoe

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2019 Posts: 8,385

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2pairsof2s

Actually, according to one of the stakers he was willing to resume the stake but was refused funding.
Apparently OP wanted the stakee to grind away at $30k in makeup playing $100 zoom? That is where the indentured servant had an advantage over the staked player who is in makeup. The servant was free of his obligation in just a few short years. The stakee will be grinding forever.

thats his friend, who is getting debunked now too, u donk

they were all friends, sorry you had to experience this guy and all.

Quote

05-05-2023 , 08:03 PM

#31

washoe

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2019 Posts: 8,385

Quote:

Originally Posted by strudman

Ultimately, it started out as four friends all in it together.

exactly. and you all somehow managed to get stuck together, so the fairest imo would be to get unstuck together. maybe just wait until the dust settles a bit and then rethink possibly restart.
problem solved.

Quote

05-06-2023 , 02:48 PM

#32

washoe

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2019 Posts: 8,385

Quote:

Originally Posted by washoe

3rd staker is the friend that brought Henry in and is now siding with.

edit: not the 3rd staker you mentioned. Adam is Henrys friend imo the 1st staker. I really don't understand why he is doing this but he seems to be biased a bit which is understandable.

How much did Henry make you guys originally? would there be an option to subtract this from the make up?
And then split the loss by 4 and chalk it up under experience.
I don't get how the amount of 30k comes together. 30k at nl100 is 300 buy ins. there's nothing that can explain this that doesn't involve some spewing, recklessness or overambition.

Quote

05-12-2023 , 02:49 PM

#33

Polarbear1955

adept

Join Date: May 2022 Posts: 955

Or deliberate dumping of the backers money to a partner. If you never intend to pay it back it can be quite profitable to "lose". Why would the person who was originally backed agree to take money out of their pocket so the loss is evenly split four ways when by doing nothing they don't lose a thing?

Quote

Page 2 of 2

First

1 2

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 2 of 2

First

1 2

Last