Quote:
Originally Posted by The Standard Station
Wow. How has anyone read this thoroughly and not supporting Guy Taylor. Fwiw I know none of these guys, but Guy very clearly was acting in good faith and the 3rd....
same here
agree to your post in all aspects.
couldn't have wrote it much better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Standard Station
Wow. How has anyone read this thoroughly and not supporting Guy Taylor. Fwiw I know none of these guys, but Guy very clearly was acting in good faith and the 3rd staker who has stayed out of this is very clearly on the same page as Guy. Its also undeniable that Adam was not acting in good faith to the business. He dropped out bc he knew Henry wasn't going to win it back(perhaps knew Henry had been losing elsewhere, was going thru mental issues, picked up a habit, who knows). But he straight bounced on his partners then acted against their best interest and tried to lie to all of us about it. How is this not a bigger deal. He was caught clear as day attempting to deceive us(so was Henry, but thats expected given the spot) and thats pretty f'd up.
Pokerplayinggamble, c'mon bro would you send funds to this kid? Who cares if he was willing to play if hes going to play like crap and torch the funds. While at the same time being very unpleasant in their personal discourse. 2 of the stakers, the only remaining 2 for that matter as the one closest to Henry decided to gg the stake didnt trust Henry would play in good faith for them.
I dunno, I was shocked to see the first response was someone against Guy after this pretty thorough and damning rebuttal by Guy that shows how his original statement was definitely factual and that Adam acted without question unethically both to the business and in his response to us where he clearly lied. You hated on him for being thorough and recording conversations? The guy wants to protect his rep which would have been shredded had he not done this. Someone was even suggesting "why isnt this clown banned". Then Guy comes and teabags Henry/Adam and y'all somehow interpret that differently?
I think it's obvious guy is in the right here. 3rd staker is the friend that brought Henry in and is now siding with him imo to save him 30k ish and a long grind back. (I'll find the quote later it's up there) all other stakers or friends are siding with guy so there is another tell. guy is making sense when the other side is not.
I don't know if suing is an option but I think a judge would clearly side with guy.
since all sides seem to want to resolve this an amicable resolution would be best and seems to be on the table.