I was at a FT yesterday where the guy on my left would 3B me very often. I'd like to know the best way to deal with this. I currently don't have fixed preflop ranges so it might not be possible to create a minimum defense frequency. Anyway, here's every hand the guy 3B me:
5 players post ante of 0.13 BB, SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop:(pot: 2.12 BB) Hero has 6 6
fold, fold, Hero raises to 2 BB, SB raises to 8 BB, fold, fold
SB wins 5.62 BB
Even knowing he was 3Betting-light, I still didn't want to call this with 40BB. There would be post-flop play and it's hard to continue without hitting a set.
Certainly 3 handed you can throw in some limps vs an aggressive player like that. It's hard because of ICM implications but if his 3 betting is through the roof you could definitely think about jamming at least the 77 hand, maybe the 66. The A9 hand you shud prob just go with, you are the shortest in chips. Open a tighter range, you can't be playing KJ or 78 suited if you know you are going to fold to a 3 bet. 78 suited prob plays ok sometimes a flat to the 3 bet.
A lot of these are folds just by looking at the stacks, and it also makes sense as to why they are playing like this. Once it's clear that they are big stacking, I think we have to tighten up and size up.
Your AJo isn't that weird of an all in by them, they've got more than 2x second place, which is you at the time, and they are just fading monsters with that jam. I don't know what percentage you'd be calling off there, but I know it's very small. Enormous ICM pressure.
Your 66 is even more ICM pressure against you looking at other 3 stacks.
A9o is a 4-bet shove for me all day. Haven't shown them a 4-bet if these are all the times they 3-bet you, ace blocker, 3 of 3 in stacks, they're at 63% 3bet SB vs BTN.
Certainly 3 handed you can throw in some limps vs an aggressive player like that. It's hard because of ICM implications but if his 3 betting is through the roof you could definitely think about jamming at least the 77 hand, maybe the 66. The A9 hand you shud prob just go with, you are the shortest in chips. Open a tighter range, you can't be playing KJ or 78 suited if you know you are going to fold to a 3 bet. 78 suited prob plays ok sometimes a flat to the 3 bet.
I don't remember thinking about limping in the button but it might have made things easier for me. Might try that next time this happens.
Your AJo isn't that weird of an all in by them, they've got more than 2x second place, which is you at the time, and they are just fading monsters with that jam. I don't know what percentage you'd be calling off there, but I know it's very small. Enormous ICM pressure.
It was weird considering he wasn't going AI in the other times he 3B me. This was the only time he shoved.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HankGrill
A9o is a 4-bet shove for me all day. Haven't shown them a 4-bet if these are all the times they 3-bet you, ace blocker, 3 of 3 in stacks, they're at 63% 3bet SB vs BTN.
With A9o, I wouldn't call his 3B but I did want to 4B-shove. Unfortunately, I went with the fold. Players like this are rare so I'm not that used to facing them.
Do you think I need to create a fixed opening range and defensive range to play against this type of player? At high stakes, is that also necessary or not really?
Certainly 3 handed you can throw in some limps vs an aggressive player like that. It's hard because of ICM implications but if his 3 betting is through the roof you could definitely think about jamming at least the 77 hand, maybe the 66. The A9 hand you shud prob just go with, you are the shortest in chips. Open a tighter range, you can't be playing KJ or 78 suited if you know you are going to fold to a 3 bet. 78 suited prob plays ok sometimes a flat to the 3 bet.
It was weird considering he wasn't going AI in the other times he 3B me. This was the only time he shoved.
Yeah I guess it's odd in that context. I just assumed they were mixing shoves at the table outside of 3 betting you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by griphix
With A9o, I wouldn't call his 3B but I did want to 4B-shove. Unfortunately, I went with the fold. Players like this are rare so I'm not that used to facing them.
Do you think I need to create a fixed opening range and defensive range to play against this type of player? At high stakes, is that also necessary or not really?
A fixed opening range is probably pretty necessary. It makes the minimum defense frequency quantifiable (hard to continue with 60% of a range you don't know) and makes adjusting a lot less guesswork. But if you know generally what you open with and understand dynamics of widening or tightening ranges, you probably don't have to memorize charts. Is there a reason you haven't created fixed opening ranges?
I will never know anything about high stakes.
Last edited by HankGrill; 11-26-2020 at 02:15 AM.
Reason: Words
Is there a reason you haven't created fixed opening ranges?
Well, before playing MTT's, I was a cash games player. I used a preflop range from PokerInABox until I memorized it and didn't need it anymore. From then on, I made adjustments based on how the table was going and kept doing the same thing when I turned to MTT's. If I were to create a range for MTT's, I would have to make one for varying stack sizes. I have access to Raise Your Edge's course so I could use bencb's ranges.
So that's the reason why I don't have fixed ranges.
Yeah that sounds like having fixed opening ranges. In case you're not, you should be using a different range for tournaments vs cash games. I'm guessing bencb's ranges will help you a lot more than I can.