https://replayer.runitup.com/hands/00f5c7c825

This spots is from MTT SNG. All 3 players are regs on those stakes. I feel like by limp/folding I am allowing BB to punish me too much, so decided to peel with very playable SC. Should our range just by reponding by limp/jaming most of a time? Calling some playable hands and traps perhaps? I know that IP is capable of putting a lot of pressure postflop due to ICM tax. My question is, because of his sizing am I allow to have a allin range? Seems like it's very face up. I decided to go for as I expect villain to be overbluffing and putting max pressure with this huge sizing, generating the most FE vs my capped weak range.

Think its a question on how you construct your raising, walking, limp/c, limp/f, limp/jam ranges in the sb.

In terms of how SC go this is one of our med/weaker ones ie: nutted ones T9s,T8s,98s,87s. With btn being so short we have to tighten our vpip ranges somewhat because of ICM we don't want to bust before him and want to lock up 3rd place.

With this in mind im happy to limp pre and just fold to 3.5x, sizing is on the bigger side, if its minimum raise peeling proly fine. We have better hands to limp/c and limp/jam including our very top TT+,AQ+ (great spot to limp/jam with our 25bb stack) Alot of the value SC have come from having the betting lead and position, neither of which we have here and with the added ICM incentive proly fine to limp/f here. Deeper stacked calling I think becomes much better.

AP, post looks fine.. putting that extra ICM pressure on here seems good. 2/3 times we proly get folds and the other 1 time when we get called we often have 36% to the river.

thank you mate. limp/f seemed too tight in game, but completely agree with it being OK due to ICM