Quote:
Originally Posted by Trex8063
Hero could bet a little smaller on flop, but I don't think I'd go all the way down to 25%......that just gives any FD's too good a price on a call (certainly with implieds it's easily "correct" for him to call such a small cbet). Half-pot at least makes it a marginal call for villain.
If going smaller, I'd probably not go below ~38-40%.
I tend to not like 25% myself either, but the solvers do a lot if you give them an option too. I usually just go for around 30% for my small bet sizing unless its a super dry flop.
There are several reason why on a dry board like this you want to bet small. I imagine a solver is betting small with most of its range here.
1) You have a pretty big range advantage has the bb has a ton a air that will fold to pretty much any size.
2) You do NOT have a nut advantage. You have stronger Qx and QQ and A3s but the bb has all of the suited 3x hands+ A3o and even worse offsuit 3x if he defends really wide.
Thinking you need to bet bigger because of the fd is an intuitive mistake. yes if you bet bigger, you do better against the bb's fds. But the bb's range is so much more wider than fds so you want a bet size that is best against the whole range.
Wrote all that before running the hand in PIO. I was mistaken a little bit. I gave it bet size options of 30%, 50%, 75%, 100%. The solver bets 30% of the pot 60% of the time and checks 40% of the time. The other bet sizes are used combined 2% of the time, so you can ignore them practically.
We do have a 60/40 range equity advantage on the flop, so Im a little surprised it doesn't bet more often. But I guess the bbs advantage in 3x combos slows us down a lot here.