Thanks, but that wasn't my question. Please read my previous posts.
When I started spending some time with these charts, I assumed that they were, like ICM, based on some "unexploitable" calculation. But the more time I spent on them, the more I learned (and the more I got frustrated).
I can find charts everywhere. E.g. D+B, Snapshove, the new Harrington book I've just read etc. and they aren't congruent:
1) The percentages differ (often just slightly)
2) The construction of the percentages (!) differs in terms of what hands to push with an x% pushing range (see below)
So while charts can be found everywhere, their calculation basis can be found nowhere. And continuing my thoughts from my previous posts:
1) Shouldn't these charts include assumptions on the looseness of our opponents? If not, how are they calculated independently from the opponents? If yes, what are the assumptions and how do they end up with (mostly) similar percentages? Are there assumptions for a "standard" opponent?
2) How are the constructed??? See the image below and these are just the first two examples that I randomly picked. And please don't tell me that it doesn't make a difference whether I push A3s UTG with 25BB (which I would never do I think) or 99.
Comparison D+B Poker calling range with Stove:
Comparison SnapShove Pushing Range with Stove:
PS: I don't think Snapshove uses any kind of algorithm for its calculations or their algorithm is flawed as I found various smaller inconsistencies. They only rammed a whole lot of ranges into a database. Example: It gives a wider shoving range for a 25BB stack than for a 24BB stack but that's not the point.