Quote:
Originally Posted by swords
Thanks for your explanation.
This guy seemed to me like he likes to play Pot's. I saw him later also opening K3s from MP1 if i remember correctly, with 2 bigstack's behind him who can 3bet him light to put pressure on him, probably not the best open raise.
I usually go with a smaller sizing, but he seemed to me like he wants to play pots. So i wanted to giv him a little more reaon's to fold pre.
But shouldnt probably go over IP 3x while their shorty's behind me.
Completly agree that i would probably most likely check back my Ace on the turn. But on the otherside, if i had something like AJ their, wouldnt it make sens to bet turn small, and get a cheap showdown? Cause if we had an Ace in that spot, and check it back river roll's of a blank and he bets like 60% pot we have a tough decision. Since that type of player who like to play pot's is willing to bluff.
Also i never expecting to get bluff/semi bluffraised in these stakes on the Final table. I feel like that happens way to rare.
Hope evrything is understandble, since my english is not the best i can offer
It's kind of tough to say what is actually best with hands like AJ-AK. If we bet turn, it's polarized, so maybe we can include AJ-AK in our value range and bet all of our air. The problem is that some rec players will just spazz raise with a worse ace, or something random, and it kind of sucks to bet-fold these hands vs. a player like this. I also want to have some Ax in my check back range...so I don't really know what's best with AJ-AK. A small turn bet might even encourage a rec player to bluff more often, so I think if you do bet it has to be a bit bigger. I had to rethink this hand a bit, and I'm still not sure whether I like betting these or checking these back vs. a typical rec player in this spot.
I think 54s plays better as a check back because we have showdown value and I'm not even sure we can bluff out hands like 55-JJ. Some players will just keep calling down on the turn. It seems kinda high variance. I think it's a little too good of a hand to start turning into a bluff on the turn. However, there are some upsides to betting if we can fold out those hands. People also tend to under barrel in 3b pots also, so it's certainly close. Both plays have some merit to them IMO.
If we do check back turn with 54s and villain checks the river, now I would consider bluffing big. He would usually lead his Qx/Ax+ for value, so now his range is filled with a lot of middling pairs like 55-JJ. It's tough for them to call down the river with these since he should realize we can check back some Ax on turn.
Interesting hand overall. I'm also kind of debating the 3b pre now. I think it's ok because of ICM pressure, position, etc. I usually like including a couple hands like 54s, 65s, 76s in my 3b-bluff range as well as some hands like AJo/KQo, A2s-A5s. I mainly throw in some 54s types for board coverage, but maybe I should be a little more careful with these lower connectors, since they are trickier to play post and make weak pairs, etc. Hands like T9s probably play a bit better.
Good hand to post, though. I thought more about this hand today and the only conclusion I came to was that I'm still unsure what I like with 54s, AJo, etc.
Maybe the best play of all is just folding pre and picking better spots, like most people mentioned.