Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Rick
H1: Because the 3-bet was 33% of villain's stack I would jam pre-flop if I am continuing. We will get it HU which is very important and we don't have to play OOP in a big pot. It's likely we lose anyway because villain is going to call the pre-flop jam if he called your turn jam...
H2: I like your reasoning. Playing 66 vs a guy who will call a lot is never good even if you have position because you will have no idea when villain hits his hand. So the jam while 20 bb's is something I have done in similar spots. I once jammed 44 in CO towards the end of day 1 WSOP Main event with roughly 20 blinds because blinds had been squeezing some. SB called with AJo. Lol. 44 held though so there was a reason to go to Day 2.
H3: If there was a possible flush draw on flop I would have lead jammed the turn. But given rainbow flop I like the call and check on turn. You got the right action the way you played, it was just a bad beat.
H3 yea I’m not complaining or anything. I just wonder if line is most profitable long run? I assume yes. I feel only hands we are scared of se JQ, and maybe some Ax combo which seems fairly unlikely. We are losing to sets and two pairs regardless. I was fairly surprised villian flatted JJ. I think I would 3! Get it in against 15bb- too many flops are scary for jj where you fold post.
Btw I thought it was cool how I got to see how bb reacted to raise on flop. I felt if he calls or raises the raise to 60k, I can pitch knowing I’m against like 2 pair etc.