Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanS-PS
It's a mistake to take tournament scheduling personally. We're aiming to provide the best playing experience for the maximum number of players, and it's just not possible while doing so to make everyone happy all of the time. The general consensus on Omaha tournaments seems to be that 6-Max is preferred, by a wide margin, over 9-Max. As for Courchevel, we made the decision to cut it from this year's offering, in favor of more Omaha. This is not to say that Courchevel cannot or will not return in the future, just that we chose not to hold a Courchevel event in 2014's WCOOP.
Thank you for the feedback!
i like the changes for 6-max. But as i mentioned a few times before regarding best playing experience in my opinion the most important thing is to increase number of hands played per hour (by decreasing time to act per street, timebank) and then decreasing blind level time so that tournaments dont last so long but the same number of hands is played (so deepness of tournaments is not effected but it is much more action and better experience). And in my opinion it doesnt decrease the skill factor of poker.
To see if this is popular you could make a survey per e-mail like you make it for the customer service very often or just test it by introducing a few of this tournaments.
it would be nice if you could tell me via pm or in this thread what you think about that suggestion. in the current state it is just too boring for me to play mtts with 40 hands per hour and often more than 10 hours until tournament end.