So regarding postflop on my second JTs hand.... Here was my thinking as best I can remember it. (The hand was played ~1.5 month ago.)
Once he calls the 4-bet preflop I think his range is crushing me because even though he was 3-betting me a lot, I had no reason to believe he was a terrible player, and he had no reason to believe I was capable of 4-betting light.
So when I hit top pair on the flop I think I'm still behind his range and betting turns my hand into a bluff - and he's not folding much if any of his range that's ahead.
I get kind of lost once he checks behind the flop and end up using the same logic I used on the flop on the turn, since he could still have easily checked behind something like JJ/QQ/AA plus maybe 99 and KK on the flop.
I agree with micro that once he also checks behind the turn there is some value in betting the river. I decided instead to c/c, so bones I think at the time I probably would have called a river bet of 38. I think betting the river myself is better though.
He showed down AsQs which is going to be crushed by my typical 4-betting range.
Quote:
Is my advice better than your coach's?
micro, I always appreciate your advice and it's always good. My coach is awesome too though! On this particular hand your postflop advice is similar but you waffled on the preflop action though so can't compare that!
He also is a big advocate of trying things out even if they might have neutral or slightly negative EV in the short term. (Because for instance, maybe I can't play in 3-bet pots as well as I should but the more I play them the better I'll get, and eventually I'll get to play a lot of strongly EV situations in big pots. That's all paraphrased for an example.)
So while I think he would agree with your advice about not adjusting too quickly, he does look favorably on sticking your neck out of your comfort zone in order to improve in the long-term. (You prolly believe that too I imagine.)